2019
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-2961-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling northern peatland area and carbon dynamics since the Holocene with the ORCHIDEE-PEAT land surface model (SVN r5488)

Abstract: The importance of northern peatlands in the global carbon cycle has been recognized, especially for long-term changes. Yet, the complex interactions between climate and peatland hydrology, carbon storage, and area dynamics make it challenging to represent these systems in land surface models. This study describes how peatlands are included as an independent sub-grid hydrological soil unit (HSU) in the ORCHIDEE-MICT land surface model. The peatland soil column in this tile is characterized by multilayered verti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
58
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
9
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This cycle of full LSM, archived output and CPU efficient emulator was repeated six times to reach a carbon and area of peat that defines the pre‐industrial conditions of our simulations. Spin‐up2: The full ORCHIDEE‐PEAT v.2.0 model is run for 100 years with atmospheric CO 2 concentration fixed at 286 ppm and repeated 1901–1920 IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M climate forcing, to allow the soil hydrological and thermal conditions to adjust to pre‐industrial climate conditions. Transient historical: A transient historical simulation from 1861 to 2005 forced by historical atmospheric CO 2 concentration, and historical bias‐corrected climate fields from IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M, respectively. Future: Forced by CO 2 from each RCP and climate change from IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M. The protocol steps 1–3 succeed in producing a reasonable representation of present‐day peatland area and C stocks (Qiu et al, 2019). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cycle of full LSM, archived output and CPU efficient emulator was repeated six times to reach a carbon and area of peat that defines the pre‐industrial conditions of our simulations. Spin‐up2: The full ORCHIDEE‐PEAT v.2.0 model is run for 100 years with atmospheric CO 2 concentration fixed at 286 ppm and repeated 1901–1920 IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M climate forcing, to allow the soil hydrological and thermal conditions to adjust to pre‐industrial climate conditions. Transient historical: A transient historical simulation from 1861 to 2005 forced by historical atmospheric CO 2 concentration, and historical bias‐corrected climate fields from IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M, respectively. Future: Forced by CO 2 from each RCP and climate change from IPSL‐CM5A‐LR and GFDL‐ESM2M. The protocol steps 1–3 succeed in producing a reasonable representation of present‐day peatland area and C stocks (Qiu et al, 2019). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the process-based land surface model ORCHIDEE-MICT (Guimberteau et al, 2018), the branch ORCHIDEE-PEAT was developed explicitly to represent peatland-specific hydrological, carbon and area dynamics. ORCHIDEE-PEAT has been tested at both local and regional levels, and a detailed description was provided by Qiu et al (2018Qiu et al ( , 2019. Here, we give only a brief outline of the model.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of models have performed large area simulations to account for regional peatland carbon dynamics (e.g. Alexandrov et al, 2016; Kleinen et al, 2012; Qiu et al, 2019; Schuldt, Brovkin, Kleinen, & Winderlich, 2013; Stocker et al, 2014; see supplementary table S1 and para 2, p. 2571 in Chaudhary et al, 2017a for more details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standalone versions of LSM's are generally more advanced than the ESM versions, due to the additional technical work required for coupling to the atmosphere. In offline mode, more LSM's account for these key processes, and other major factors such as the impact of organic matter on soil thermal and hydraulic properties (Lawrence et al, 2012;Chadburn et al, 2015;Kleinen and Brovkin, 2018;Qiu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Land Surface Models (Lsms)mentioning
confidence: 99%