1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
115
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
115
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Fit through observed MSI-data of over 500 subjects by McCauley et al (1976) versus frequency (f) and RMS acceleration amplitude (A RMS ). Right: Predicted data by Bos and Bles (1998). Both curves show an increase of sickness incidence with increasing amplitude, and both also exhibit a peak around 0.16 Hz Intermezzo: Motion sickness.…”
Section: Internal Models: Howmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fit through observed MSI-data of over 500 subjects by McCauley et al (1976) versus frequency (f) and RMS acceleration amplitude (A RMS ). Right: Predicted data by Bos and Bles (1998). Both curves show an increase of sickness incidence with increasing amplitude, and both also exhibit a peak around 0.16 Hz Intermezzo: Motion sickness.…”
Section: Internal Models: Howmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, this model does not describe motion sickness characteristics as they are observed, because no explicit low-pass ®lter was applied in both aerent paths as explained above. Bles (1998), Bles et al (1998) and Bos and Bles (1998) adapted this model as follows. We ®rst noted that people only get sick if: (a) they do have a functioning vestibular apparatus, (b) gravity changes relative to their body/head and (c) they anticipate this gravity component incorrectly.…”
Section: Internal Models: Howmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motion sickness due to mild motion may also go unnoticed initially, but can accumulate giving rise ocular, disorienting, and vertiginous and/or nauseating effects [46,73], showing a certain overlap with the disorienting symptoms associated with MD. Moreover, the most popular theory on motion sickness by Reason & Brand [73] has been further elaborated to include equal assumptions about efference copies and afferent signals as applied by Sugie [7,8,9,11,63,89]. Note that the discomforting conflict in Ménière does not require actual, or more specifically exogenous body motion.…”
Section: The Therapeutic Effect Of Wabipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key nauseogenic motion component is thought to be variation in the direction and magnitude of the gravito-inertial force vector (GIF) which is usually the addition of the force of gravity and the imposed acceleration due to vehicle motion [2]. For human subjects, maximum susceptibility is observed in a frequency range around 0.2 to 0.3Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%