2012
DOI: 10.7750/biodiscovery.2012.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Malignant Progression with a Finite State Machine Supports a Two Checkpoint Theory of Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study we showed that the loss of the G1-S and/or SAC checkpoints were critical to the description of cancer [8]. This was consistent with Duesberg’s theory [9] which suggested that cancer is, in essence, a disease of chromosomal instability.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study we showed that the loss of the G1-S and/or SAC checkpoints were critical to the description of cancer [8]. This was consistent with Duesberg’s theory [9] which suggested that cancer is, in essence, a disease of chromosomal instability.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…What they have in common is that all are involved in control of the cell cycle or its associated signalling pathways (including the apoptosis pathways). [ 8 , 25 27 ]Understanding the dynamics of tumour growth and the pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs could be greatly assisted by quantitative descriptions of these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation