“…As noted by Flay et al (2017), this observation is supported by evidence of an LSB farther downstream along the chord. For example, Martin (2015), Flay et al (2017) and Nava et al (2017) have shown a clear LSB towards the rear of a circular arc, especially for a low AoA (lesser than the ideal one), and low Reynolds number. The sudden change occurring below and above a specific critical Reynolds number was discussed by Flay et al (2017).…”
Section: Leading-edge-separation Bubble and Laminar-separation Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid and time resolution required to apply an LES model is significantly higher to that of DES, and is unachievable even by very large supercomputers. However, some under-resolved simulations have been performed with some degree of success both for upwind (Nava et al, 2017) and downwind (Nava et al, 2018) sails. Nava et al (2017) undertook LES of upwind sails and flat plates, where the latter investigation is based on the low-Reynolds number experimental work of Crompton & Barrett (2000) that has often been used as a benchmark for low-camber sails (Collie, 2006;Collie et al, 2008).…”
Section: Leading-edge Vortex Of Downwind Sails: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some under-resolved simulations have been performed with some degree of success both for upwind (Nava et al, 2017) and downwind (Nava et al, 2018) sails. Nava et al (2017) undertook LES of upwind sails and flat plates, where the latter investigation is based on the low-Reynolds number experimental work of Crompton & Barrett (2000) that has often been used as a benchmark for low-camber sails (Collie, 2006;Collie et al, 2008). A key advantage of LES over RANS was originally shown by Sampaio et al (2014) and confirmed by Nava et al (2017) on upwind sails: the ability to predict the second recirculation bubble typical of long leading-edge bubbles.…”
Section: Leading-edge Vortex Of Downwind Sails: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
Over the past two decades, the numerical and experimental progresses made in the field of downwind sail aerodynamics have contributed to a new understanding of their behaviour and improved designs. Contemporary advances include the numerical and experimental evidence of the leading-edge vortex, as well as greater correlation between model and full-scale testing. Nevertheless, much remains to be understood on the aerodynamics of downwind sails and their flow structures. In this paper, a detailed review of the different flow features of downwind sails, including the effect of separation bubbles and leading-edge vortices will be discussed. New experimental measurements of the flow field around a highly cambered thin circular arc geometry, representative of a bi-dimensional section of a spinnaker, will also be presented here for the first time. These results allow interpretation of some inconsistent data from past experiments and simulations, and to provide guidance for future model testing and sail design.
“…As noted by Flay et al (2017), this observation is supported by evidence of an LSB farther downstream along the chord. For example, Martin (2015), Flay et al (2017) and Nava et al (2017) have shown a clear LSB towards the rear of a circular arc, especially for a low AoA (lesser than the ideal one), and low Reynolds number. The sudden change occurring below and above a specific critical Reynolds number was discussed by Flay et al (2017).…”
Section: Leading-edge-separation Bubble and Laminar-separation Bubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid and time resolution required to apply an LES model is significantly higher to that of DES, and is unachievable even by very large supercomputers. However, some under-resolved simulations have been performed with some degree of success both for upwind (Nava et al, 2017) and downwind (Nava et al, 2018) sails. Nava et al (2017) undertook LES of upwind sails and flat plates, where the latter investigation is based on the low-Reynolds number experimental work of Crompton & Barrett (2000) that has often been used as a benchmark for low-camber sails (Collie, 2006;Collie et al, 2008).…”
Section: Leading-edge Vortex Of Downwind Sails: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some under-resolved simulations have been performed with some degree of success both for upwind (Nava et al, 2017) and downwind (Nava et al, 2018) sails. Nava et al (2017) undertook LES of upwind sails and flat plates, where the latter investigation is based on the low-Reynolds number experimental work of Crompton & Barrett (2000) that has often been used as a benchmark for low-camber sails (Collie, 2006;Collie et al, 2008). A key advantage of LES over RANS was originally shown by Sampaio et al (2014) and confirmed by Nava et al (2017) on upwind sails: the ability to predict the second recirculation bubble typical of long leading-edge bubbles.…”
Section: Leading-edge Vortex Of Downwind Sails: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
Over the past two decades, the numerical and experimental progresses made in the field of downwind sail aerodynamics have contributed to a new understanding of their behaviour and improved designs. Contemporary advances include the numerical and experimental evidence of the leading-edge vortex, as well as greater correlation between model and full-scale testing. Nevertheless, much remains to be understood on the aerodynamics of downwind sails and their flow structures. In this paper, a detailed review of the different flow features of downwind sails, including the effect of separation bubbles and leading-edge vortices will be discussed. New experimental measurements of the flow field around a highly cambered thin circular arc geometry, representative of a bi-dimensional section of a spinnaker, will also be presented here for the first time. These results allow interpretation of some inconsistent data from past experiments and simulations, and to provide guidance for future model testing and sail design.
“…In this study yachts sailing upwind are modelled using the RANS CFD code ANSYS CFX. The model is validated against published experimental data for a rigid sail model of the yacht( [4,13]) which has previously been used to validate RANS ( [12], [7]) models. The apparent motion between two yachts on opposite tacks is reproduced by having the yachts modelled in two separate meshes that move with respect to each other.…”
“…Sampaio's investigation is particularly relevant to modelling sailing yacht aerodynamics, since the flat plate leading edge separation bubble is similar to the separation bubble forming at the leading edge (or luff) of sails. Nava et al [12] applied LES to the modelling of an experiment of upwind sailing, showing the superior ability of LES compared to RANS in predicting the leading edge structures formed at the luff of the sails, and reproducing the experimental pressure distribution, particularly at the head of the mainsail.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.