Modelling in mixed matrix membranes for gas separation

Abstract

Various gas permeation models including Maxwell model, Bruggeman model, Lewis‐Nielson model and Pal model were compared via a modelling approach with the relative permeance of CO2 against published experimental data on silica filled polysulfone/polyimide (PSF/PI) mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). However, none of the tested models were able to predict the data with good accurately. A closer look at the cross‐sectional image by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that the fillers were actually prolate ellipsoids dispersed within the matrix. Maxwell‐Wagner‐Sillar model was then employed to investigate the prolate effect and it was observed that the optimization curves of maximum packing (φm) and shape factor (n) showed least deviations. The percentage average absolute relative error (AARE %) value for fitted shape factor (nf) was found to be in the range of 1.12–2.17 at 2–10 bar pressure which showed its robustness. A further evaluation from SEM image showed that the shape factor along z‐direction (nz) displayed a minimum deviation of 17.52 % for prolates at 0.102 ± 0.01. By using nz as upper limit and estimated shape factor ne through generalization, the error was reduced to 6.01 %. The AAR % deviation was found in the order of nf <ne < nz,which indicated the importance of shape factor parameter for estimating true CO2 permeance.

Modeling Permeation through Mixed-Matrix Membranes: A Review

“…leads to Equation (42) in Table 3 after integration [138,165]. The Bruggeman model is assumed to be applicable to moderate filler loadings (0 ) 0.35 f φ ≤ ≤ [135,139,146].…”

“…To do so, He considered that the differential increment in the dielectric permeability (dP) resulting from addition of new particles was well described by P r = P e f f /P c = 1 + 3β f c φ f , that upon substitution of P c → P , P m → P + dP , and φ f → dφ f /(1 − φ f ) leads to Equation (42) in Table 3 after integration [138,165]. The Bruggeman model is assumed to be applicable to moderate filler loadings (0 ≤ φ f ≤ 0.35) [135,139,146]. Table 3.…”

Extending effective medium theory to finite size systems: Theory and simulation for permeation in mixed-matrix membranes

“…where fc PP   is the ratio of the permeability of the dispersed to the continuous phase. Since the Maxwell model disregards interaction between particles, it generally describes the permeability well only at low loadings of filler particles with 0.2 o   [2,6,14,46]. Furthermore, the Maxwell model is the simplest among the various models presented in Table 1, and considers dispersant particle size to be negligibly small with no aggregation [2,17,30,35,46].…”

Membranes for CO2 /CH4 and CO2/N2 Gas Separation

“…Many different types of membranes such a polymeric membranes , metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) , carbon material , , zeolite , , and mixed‐matrix membranes (MMMs) are synthesized for the separation of CO 2 from different gas mixtures.…”