2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nakagawa and Mituzani [24] discuss the importance of considering maintenance policies with finite planning horizons for systems such as power plants and civil infrastructures. Berrade et al [8] model imperfect inspection policies for a system with a finite operational time requirement. These models allow one to explore maintenance planning options for systems that are close to retirement.…”
Section: Finite Horizon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nakagawa and Mituzani [24] discuss the importance of considering maintenance policies with finite planning horizons for systems such as power plants and civil infrastructures. Berrade et al [8] model imperfect inspection policies for a system with a finite operational time requirement. These models allow one to explore maintenance planning options for systems that are close to retirement.…”
Section: Finite Horizon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let c r be the corresponding penalty cost rate. Following Berrade et al ( [8]) the objective function is given as follows:…”
Section: Finite Horizon Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While they are lies within range [0‐1], 1 refers to the highest accuracy (perfect inspection) and the 0 indicates the worst precision or the lowest probability of state detection (imperfect inspection). Noteworthy is that the inspection error probability involved via P O in the model usually acquires 0.7 to 1 …”
Section: Aging Failure Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He has derived results for determining when it is prudent to carry out at least one inspection over a finite planning horizon for the case of imperfect inspections. Usher et al who have discussed the case of a finite planning horizon with minimization of costs as their objective function. Nakagawa et al who have discussed the application of basic inspection policies over a finite time span to five models: back‐up for a hard disk, checkpoint for double modular redundancy, job partition, garbage collection, and network partition. Nakagawa and Mizutani who have developed three replacement policies for a one‐unit system; for the replacement policies, n identical units are sequentially replaced over a finite period [0, L ] in accordance with some set rules. Taghipour et al who have proposed a model to find the optimal periodic inspection interval on a finite time horizon for a complex repairable system. The system has components that can experience ‘hard failures’ (which are detected as and when they occur) and ‘soft failures’, which are only detected when an inspection is carried out. Ahmadi and Newby who use a new approach (which they defined as the intensity control model) at determining an optimal inspection schedule over a production run of finite length L with the sole objective of minimizing overall costs. Berrade et al who have researched on periodic inspections being conducted on a system over a finite planning horizon of length L . The inspections in their paper are imperfect, and the criterion they use is minimization of total cost over the planning horizon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%