2016
DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Illegal Drug Participation

Abstract: Summary. We contribute to the small, but important, literature exploring the incidence and implications of misreporting in survey data. Specifically, when modelling 'social bads', such as illegal drug consumption, researchers are often faced with exceptionally low reported participation rates. We propose a modelling framework where firstly an individual decides whether to participate or not and, secondly, for participants there is a subsequent decision to misreport or not. We explore misreporting in the contex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar context, Brown et al (2018) consider the modelling of illicit drug participation. There, the basic hypothesis is that, due to very similar reasons to those considered in the current paper, a subset of true illicit drug participants, will actually mis-report their true behaviour.…”
Section: Econometric Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar context, Brown et al (2018) consider the modelling of illicit drug participation. There, the basic hypothesis is that, due to very similar reasons to those considered in the current paper, a subset of true illicit drug participants, will actually mis-report their true behaviour.…”
Section: Econometric Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor can we entirely rule out systematic under‐reporting of drug use of the kind that was discussed by Brown et al . (), although only 20% (52%) of the wave 1 sample reported never having used cannabis (illegal drugs other than cannabis).…”
Section: Data—‘journeys Home’mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Again we cannot rule out recall error in the reported age at which the individual first engaged in these behaviours. Nor can we entirely rule out systematic under-reporting of drug use of the kind that was discussed by Brown et al (2018), although only 20% (52%) of the wave 1 sample reported never having used cannabis (illegal drugs other than cannabis).…”
Section: Data-'journeys Home'mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In terms of the other control variables, we follow the existing literature (e.g. Cameron and Williams, ; Ramful and Zhao, ; Brown et al ., ) and include the following: gender; age; whether the individual is of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent; whether the individual resides in a capital city; is married or cohabiting; comes from a single‐parent household; whether or not there are preschool‐aged children in the household; educational attainment distinguishing between four categories of highest educational attainment as follows: a tertiary degree, a non‐tertiary diploma or trade certificate, year 12 education and less than year 12 education, which is the omitted category; the natural logarithm of real personal annual income before tax measured in Australian dollars and the individual's main labour market status. Finally, for our analysis of the sample of employed individuals, we focus on industry and occupation effects; the classifications, based on the Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification and the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations, are detailed in the following section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%