Modelling housing prices and market fundamentals: evidence from the Sydney housing market

Abstract

Purpose Housing prices in Sydney have increased rapidly in the past three decades. This leads to a debate of whether Sydney housing prices have departed from macroeconomic fundamentals. However, little research has been devoted to this area. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by examining the long-run association between housing prices and market fundamentals. Further, it also examines the long-run determinants of housing prices in Greater Sydney. Design/methodology/approach The analysis of this study involves two stages. The first stage is to estimate the presence of long-run relationship between housing prices and market fundamentals with the Johansen and Juselius Cointegration test. Thereafter, the determinants of housing prices in Greater Sydney is assessed by using a vector error correction model. Findings The empirical results show that Sydney housing prices are cointegrated with market fundamentals in the long run. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that market fundamentals such as gross disposable income, housing supply, unemployment rate and gross domestic product are the key long-run determinants of Sydney housing prices, reflecting that Sydney housing prices, in general, can be explained by market fundamentals in the long run. Research limitations/implications The findings enable more informed and practical policy and investment decision-making regarding the relation between housing prices and market fundamentals. Originality/value This paper is the first study to offer empirical evidence of the degree to which the behaviour of housing prices can be explained by market fundamentals, from a capital city instead of at a national level, using a relatively disaggregated dataset of housing price series for Greater Sydney.

Identification of house price bubbles using robust methodology: evidence from Polish provincial capitals

“…When comparing the adjusted values, there are also no significant dissimilarities for particular estimation methods. In general, they range from 0.20 to 0.55, indicating good matching of the models to the data compared to other studies (see, e.g., Hwang & Quigley, 2006 ; Al-Masum & Lee, 2019 ). Furthermore, as Stevenson ( 2008 ) notes, not obtaining very high R 2 values in studies regarding the occurrence of house price bubbles is not worrisome because the purpose of this type of analysis is not to explain actually existing market movements but to model fundamental house prices.…”

Residential property market determinants: evidence from the 2018 Australian market downturn

“…Rahman (2008) classified housing factors into three broad categories, namely the short/cyclical, institutional and long-term variables, and concluded that interest rates, investment demand, existing economic climate are the short-term determinants, whereas economic growth and wealth effect are the long-term factors. In the most recent scholarly literature, Al-Masum and Lee (2019) revealed that population growth and lending are insignificant in explaining Sydney house prices in the long run, whereas Nguyen and Wang (2019) suggested that strong projected population growth will help sustain the Australian economy in the short run.…”

Modeling of residential property rents in Somalia using two-stage modeling

“…According to Arestis et al (2017), the house price overvaluation might take place because of imbalance between demand and supply of housing. Although the housing sector is a crucial part of the economy, an accelerated growth of property values may be an indication of a housing bubble, which would have a detrimental effect on the economy (Al-Masum and Lee, 2019; Chen et al , 1986; Liu et al , 2017; Stevenson, 2008). This issue has created a hot debate among scholars and experts of housing economics.…”