2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling golden eagle habitat selection and flight activity in their home ranges for safer wind farm planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They make the simplistic assumption that the higher the abundance of individuals of a given species is at a particular site, the higher their susceptibility for collision with wind energy structures installed at that particular site [31,32]. This assumption has been readily challenged by many researchers, since their findings show that the pre-construction bird abundances and the observed numbers of carcasses as a measure of the post-construction bird collisions through detections are not closely related [12,33,34]. The German State Bird Conservancies have also additionally developed recommendations in terms of the distances of wind turbines to such important bird areas as well as to the breeding sites of different species of birds [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They make the simplistic assumption that the higher the abundance of individuals of a given species is at a particular site, the higher their susceptibility for collision with wind energy structures installed at that particular site [31,32]. This assumption has been readily challenged by many researchers, since their findings show that the pre-construction bird abundances and the observed numbers of carcasses as a measure of the post-construction bird collisions through detections are not closely related [12,33,34]. The German State Bird Conservancies have also additionally developed recommendations in terms of the distances of wind turbines to such important bird areas as well as to the breeding sites of different species of birds [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance to the nest was included in all models because it is known to be important in describing space use by all breeding raptors, which demonstrate central‐place foraging by typically returning to a nest (Newton, 1979). Slope was the next most important variable in our CRP model, likely due to the orographic lift which is generated along hillsides and is a primary determinant of how large territorial raptors use their surrounding landscape (Bosch et al., 2010; Murgatroyd et al., 2018; Reid et al., 2015; Tikkanen et al., 2018; Watson et al., 2014). In addition, CRP was also higher at closer distances to any slope, reflecting the habitat preference of these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive space‐use models are able to overcome many of these issues if they are generalisable to areas where no tracking data have been collected. For raptors, a few predictive models have been devised to determine collision risk (Mcleod et al., 2002; Reid et al., 2015; Tikkanen et al., 2018), however, their generalisability and model performance are rarely explored, and we are un‐aware of any study that directly compares the efficacy of describing raptor space use between predictive models and circular buffers (but see: Watson et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flight height datasets are often reduced to a single summary metric, the mean flight height and its variation with environmental and individual covariates [29,[46][47][48][49]. This decision is mostly based on the ease of implementing spreadsheets, linear models, moving averages, or spline models.…”
Section: The Mean Flight Height Is Not Sufficient To Describe the Distribution Of Flight Heightsmentioning
confidence: 99%