Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering Companion 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3053600.3053609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Energy Efficient Server Management Policies in PEPA

Abstract: Power inefficiency has become a major concern for large scale computing providers. In this paper, we model turning servers on and off to keep a balance between capacity and energy saving. Several heuristic-based switching policies are introduced with a view to balance the cost between power saving and performance. Models are specified using a Markovian process algrebra, which allows explicit representation of system behaviour and facilitates numerical analysis using the supporting tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research approaches are energy-oriented workload dispatch [7]- [9], [34] and server consolidation [10]- [17], [33] which dynamically adjust the active server set in order to turn off a portion of servers and save computing energy without compromising the quality of service.…”
Section: Computing Energy Saving Scheduling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research approaches are energy-oriented workload dispatch [7]- [9], [34] and server consolidation [10]- [17], [33] which dynamically adjust the active server set in order to turn off a portion of servers and save computing energy without compromising the quality of service.…”
Section: Computing Energy Saving Scheduling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third variable that supposedly influences the environmental context in GITL is environmental sustainability motivating forces, as explained by the theory of planned behavior (TPB) [32], which refers to the social [91], ecological [92], [93], and end-company prestige implications [94] that organizations adopt to improve their image and favor planet care while optimizing resources and productivity.…”
Section: Environmental Sustainability Motivating Forces (Esm)mentioning
confidence: 99%