2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1938704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Electricity Forward Markets by Ambit Fields

Abstract: This paper proposes a new modelling framework for electricity forward markets, which is based on ambit fields. The new model can capture many of the stylised facts observed in energy markets. One of the main differences to the traditional models lies in the fact that we do not model the dynamics, but the forward price directly, where we focus on models which are stationary in time. We give a detailed account on the probabilistic properties of the new model and we discuss martingale conditions and change of mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, X(t, x) can be interpreted as the futures price at time t ≥ 0 for a contract delivering the commodity at time x ≥ 0, with a dynamics specified under the Heath-JarrowMorton-Musiela (HJMM) modelling paradigm (see Heath, Jarrow and Morton [19] and Musiela [21]). We connect our general SV modelling approach to the analysis in Benth and Krühner [9,10] and the ambit field approach in Barndorff-Nielsen, Benth and Veraart [3,4]. We remark that this discussion can be extended to forward rate modelling under the HJM paradigm in fixed-income theory (see Filipovic [15] and Carmona and Theranchi [13] for an analysis of HJM models in infinite dimensions for fixed-income markets.…”
Section: Dx(t) = Ax(t) Dt + σ(T) Db(t)mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, X(t, x) can be interpreted as the futures price at time t ≥ 0 for a contract delivering the commodity at time x ≥ 0, with a dynamics specified under the Heath-JarrowMorton-Musiela (HJMM) modelling paradigm (see Heath, Jarrow and Morton [19] and Musiela [21]). We connect our general SV modelling approach to the analysis in Benth and Krühner [9,10] and the ambit field approach in Barndorff-Nielsen, Benth and Veraart [3,4]. We remark that this discussion can be extended to forward rate modelling under the HJM paradigm in fixed-income theory (see Filipovic [15] and Carmona and Theranchi [13] for an analysis of HJM models in infinite dimensions for fixed-income markets.…”
Section: Dx(t) = Ax(t) Dt + σ(T) Db(t)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our stochastic volatility model serves as a motivation for an extension of the ambit field models. We refer to Barndorff-Nielsen, Benth and Veraart [3] and [4] for an application of ambit fields to energy forward price modelling.…”
Section: Application To Forward Price Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend the book [13] for an exposition of various related approaches and extensions of this framework, including capturing cross-commodity correlation. More recently, Barndorff-Nielsen et al [9,8] propose a new approach for both spot and forward prices using ambit fields, and in particular Levy semi-stationary processes.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the stack model in (15) and (16), along with distributions given by (7) and p i by (17), the forward power price for time T delivery can be found (again using (8)) to be…”
Section: Version Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barndorff-Nielsen, Benth and Veraart [6] propose to use ambit fields, a class of spatio-temporal random fields, as an alternative modelling approach to the dynamic specification of forward curves used in the present paper. In a recent paper, Barndorff-Nielsen, Benth and Veraart [7] has extended the ambit field idea to cross-commodity market modelling and the pricing of spread options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%