2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling diurnal and seasonal patterns of maize pollen emission in relation to meteorological factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average normalized hourly oak pollen emission flux (with standard deviation) at Pasadena shows a dominant peak during the afternoon with around 20 % of daily total emission release at 16:00 LT and a small peak during evening hours. The calculated typical E P diurnal profile has a unimodal distribution with the peak in the afternoon, which is consistent with other observational and modeling studies (Jones and Harrison, 2004;Laursen et al, 2007;Marceau et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pollen Emission Potential and Emission Ratesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average normalized hourly oak pollen emission flux (with standard deviation) at Pasadena shows a dominant peak during the afternoon with around 20 % of daily total emission release at 16:00 LT and a small peak during evening hours. The calculated typical E P diurnal profile has a unimodal distribution with the peak in the afternoon, which is consistent with other observational and modeling studies (Jones and Harrison, 2004;Laursen et al, 2007;Marceau et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pollen Emission Potential and Emission Ratesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Even though the details of the schemes vary, two core parts are central to all models, namely pollen emission and pollen transport. For the pollen emission component, the start, end, and duration of the pollen season as well as the diurnal emission profiles are typically generated via a regression analysis between observed pollen counts and key meteorological factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed (Jones and Harrison 2004;Schuler and Schlünzen, 2006;Laursen et al, 2007;Marceau et al, 2011). The spatial patterns of the pollen sources are based on vegetation distribution maps, which are subject to large uncertainties (Sofiev et al, , 2013Skjøth et al, 2010;Pauling et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average normalized hourly oak pollen emission flux (with standard deviation) at Pasadena shows a dominant peak during afternoon with around 20% of daily total emission release at 4 pm local time and a small peak during evening hours. The calculated typical E P diurnal profile has a unimodal distribution with the peak in the afternoon, which is consistent with other observational and modeling studies (Jones and Harrison, 2004; Laursen et al, 2007; Marceau et al, 2011). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Even though the details of the schemes vary, two core parts are central to all models, namely pollen emission and pollen transport. For the pollen emission component, the start, end, and duration of the pollen season as well as the diurnal emission profiles are typically generated via a regression analysis between observed pollen counts and key meteorological factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed (Jones and Harrison 2004; Schuler and Schlünzen, 2006; Laursen et al, 2007; Marceau et al, 2011). The spatial patterns of the pollen sources are based on vegetation distribution maps, which are subject to large uncertainties (Sofiev et al, 2006; Skjøth et al, 2010; Pauling et al, 2011; Sofiev et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Pollen-mediated gene flow may result from the adventitious mixing of non-GM maize from neighboring GM fields. [4][5][6] Gene flow can be monitored by measuring a recipient field's levels of cross-pollination (CP) at various distances from pollen source. The CP rate of a maize recipient is defined as the percentage of off-types in a progeny by detecting the xenia effect in the progeny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%