2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling demand response aggregator behavior in wind power offering strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retailer decides about the optimal price that maximize its profit, while the consumer optimizes its consumption based on the specified price. Mahmoudi et al [17] presented bilevel programing in which a wind power producer determines its favorable price to buy DR for covering its stochastic generation and then the aggregator determines its DR involvement. The authors of [18] proposed an interesting bilevel model for implementing DR programs between retailers and customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retailer decides about the optimal price that maximize its profit, while the consumer optimizes its consumption based on the specified price. Mahmoudi et al [17] presented bilevel programing in which a wind power producer determines its favorable price to buy DR for covering its stochastic generation and then the aggregator determines its DR involvement. The authors of [18] proposed an interesting bilevel model for implementing DR programs between retailers and customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] Some of these strategies exploit the equilibrium in oligopolistic markets 15 or assume a risk-constrained behavior. 16 Although not the goal of this work, interested readers on optimal coordination between wind and other energy resources such as CHP, 17 hydro, 18 demand response, 19,20 among others 21,22 are referred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At day-ahead stage, in regard to DR resources participating in both energy and reserve scheduling, a robust model is given in [38] to schedule smart distribution network to immunize uncertainties. Aiming to mitigate the impact of wind power variability, an agent-based modeling framework is used to represent hierarchical power systems [39], and a DR aggregator is employed by a wind power producer to make offering strategies [40]. In view of control schemes, thermostatic loads are aggregated to manage frequency and energy imbalances in power systems [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%