2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling decomposition of standard plant material along an altitudinal gradient: A re-analysis of data of Coûteaux et al. (2002)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found that increased respiration under warming in the early part of incubation is best modeled with an increase in the size of the active pool (C a ) with warming, whereas the decay constant (k a ) for that pool stays relatively constant (Table S1) in the Duke soils (flux data from Aspen soils did not fit the model). This pattern has been found in many studies, and it has resulted in an ongoing debate about whether temperature dependence can be in both the pool size terms and the rate constant (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, we found that increased respiration under warming in the early part of incubation is best modeled with an increase in the size of the active pool (C a ) with warming, whereas the decay constant (k a ) for that pool stays relatively constant (Table S1) in the Duke soils (flux data from Aspen soils did not fit the model). This pattern has been found in many studies, and it has resulted in an ongoing debate about whether temperature dependence can be in both the pool size terms and the rate constant (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…MOMOS allowed us to adequately predict total and microbial 14 C dynamics during the decomposition of a standard plant material (wheat straw) in six extremely contrasting tropical environments using only one parameter specific to each site ( k resp ) instead of the two or three site specific parameters necessary in previous analysis using the same database to predict only total 14 C by two exponential models [ Coûteaux et al , 2002; Braakhekke and de Bruijn , 2007]. Furthermore, only this parameter k resp is related to soil properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen parameter values were necessary to describe 14 C mineralization along the gradient, and only 30% of the between‐site variability could be ascribed to climatic differences. Braakhekke and de Bruijn [2007] reanalyzed the same data to reduce the modeling complexity but had to maintain different mineralization rates for each site, and 13 parameter values were again necessary to predict the whole total 14 C data. The Transalt data were never used before to predict the 14 C transfer processes both in humus and atmosphere and validate models of organic matter in soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the "equal-time" approach always leads to great discrepancies in the degradation of fast-vs. slow-turnover C pools among samples along with increasing incubation temperature and time, while the "equal-C" approach can underestimate the contribution of more recalcitrant substrates (Hamdi et al, 2013). Although a first-order model has been applied to disentangle the C mineralization process to quantify the sizes of various labile and recalcitrant pools as well as their decomposition rate constants, the temperature sensitivity of the abovementioned kinetic parameters of C mineralization has seldom been investigated (Braakhekke and de Bruijn, 2007;Bracho et al, 2016;Rey et al, 2008;Sun et al, 2016). Although Rey and Jarvis (2006) found that the labile C proportion (a 0 ) did not vary among 4, 10, 20 and 30°C, their experimental data were only derived from upper mineral soils, whose estimated labile fraction from the two-compartment model might be too small (1-9%) to detect substantial differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Rey and Jarvis (2006) found that the labile C proportion (a 0 ) did not vary among 4, 10, 20 and 30°C, their experimental data were only derived from upper mineral soils, whose estimated labile fraction from the two-compartment model might be too small (1-9%) to detect substantial differences. The C pool sizes were reported to vary with the substrate quality, the microbial community composition and the environmental conditions (Braakhekke and de Bruijn, 2007;CoÛteaux et al, 2002;Erhagen et al, 2015). In principle, a change in temperature can induce shifts in functional microorganisms and in enzyme activities, modify the primary resource decomposition pathways and the secondary material production, and, finally, affect the sizes of the labile or recalcitrant C pools (Dalias et al, 2001;Razavi et al, 2016Razavi et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%