Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees

Abstract

An individual-oriented model is constructed which simulates the collective foraging behaviour of a colony of honey-bees, Apis mellifera. Each bee follows the same set of behavioural rules. Each rule consists of a set of conditions followed by the behavioural act to be performed if the conditions are ful®lled. The set of conditions comprises the state of external information available to the bee (e.g. the dancing of other bees) and internal information variables (like memorised location of a food source and homing motivation). The rules are partly observational (i.e. they capture the observable regularities between the present external information and the individual bee's behaviour), and partly involve hypothesised internal-state variables (e.g. abandoning tendency and homing motivation), because no observable (physiological) aspect has as yet been detected in the bee which correlates with changes in the internal motivation. Our aim is to obtain a set of rules that is necessary and su cient for the generation of the collective foraging behaviour observed in real bees. We simulated an experiment performed by Seeley et al. in which a colony of honey-bees chooses between two nectar sources of di erent pro®tabilities which are switched at intervals. A good ®t between observed and simulated collective forager patterns was obtained when the model included rules in which the bees (1) relied on the information acquired from previous¯ights to a source (e.g. pro®tability and time of day when the source was found), (2) used positional information obtained by attending recruitment dances and (3) did not abandon a (temporarily) deteriorated source too fast or too slowly. The signi®cance of the following issues is discussed: the role of internal and external information, source profitability, the spatial precision of the dance communication, the ability to search for a source after the source position has been transmitted, the tendency to abandon a deteriorated source, and the concepts of scout, recruit, (un)employed forager, and foraging history.Key words Honey-bee á Collective behavior á Collective foraging á Communication á Individual-oriented model`I t may be that. You never can tell with bees.'' from Winnie the Pooh by A. A. Milne (1926).

Bee hive at work: A problem solving, optimizing mechanism

“…• Modelling of bees behaviour ( [4], [5]) • Constructing algorithms inspired by bees behaviour Our work belongs to the latter category, since our aim is to develop a simple model of the bee hive applicable to solving problems in different domains.…”

Bee Hive at Work: Following a Developing Story on the Web

“…Models of bees collectively looking for collecting nectar are dissertated in [25]. Individually oriented simulation is constructed to simulate collective behaviour of bees in time of foraging.…”

Prévision des potentialités de production de miel à l’échelle d’un rucher au moyen d’un système d’information géographique

“…Les risques de prédation, parasitisme et pollution (Porrini et al, 2003) sont à prendre en compte également. Enfin, la collecte de nectar et la production de miel dépendent d'un grand nombre de paramètres internes à la colonie, liés ou non à la conduite de la ruche par l'apiculteur : l'état sanitaire, le patrimoine génétique de la reine et de sa descendance (Delaplane, 1997), la communication et les interactions sociales et hormonales entre ouvrières (Arruego, 1999), les besoins et la structure de la colonie (Ikeno et Ohtani, 2001), mais aussi les comportements individuels tels que la mémorisation de la localisation des ressources (de Vries and Biesmeijer, 1998), le choix des fleurs, la sensibilité au risque (Beauchamp, 1992).…”

“…Certains prédisent la dynamique comportementale des butineuses, validée au moyen d'expériences sur des ressources alimentaires artificielles Seeley et al, 1991 ;de Vries et Biesmeijer, 1998). D'autres modélisent l'efficience énergétique d'une ruche en relation avec un nombre élevé de sources théoriques de nourriture dont les gains et pertes énergétiques varient (Bartholdi et al, 1993 ;Dukas et Edelstein-Keshet, 1998).…”