2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
153
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
17
153
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a number of studies on the influential factors of the growth of car ownership in North America (Potoglou and Kanaroglou, 2008) and the European Union (Kain, 2001). The findings have facilitated our understanding on the socioeconomic characteristics and built environment correlates to car ownership and provided important policy implications for interventions (Ding et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of studies on the influential factors of the growth of car ownership in North America (Potoglou and Kanaroglou, 2008) and the European Union (Kain, 2001). The findings have facilitated our understanding on the socioeconomic characteristics and built environment correlates to car ownership and provided important policy implications for interventions (Ding et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, while several studies from North America point to a mitigating influence of urban design on car ownership and use (e.g. Bento et al 2005;Potoglou and Kanaroglou 2008;Van Acker and Witlox 2010), there have been relatively fewer studies that have investigated this linkage in the European context (some exceptions include Hedel 2008 andBuehler 2011). Given that choices about land development tend to have long-lasting impacts that span over decades, quantification of the influence of landscape pattern on car use is highly significant to the formulation of contemporary planning strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Bhat and Pulugurta (7) argued that a multinomial logit model (MNL) model would be more appropriate for modelling car ownership over an ordered logit (ORL) model, subsequent empirical studies have developed ordered probit (ORP) or ORL models claiming the discrete, ordered nature of the dependent variable (8,9) as well as MNL models on the basis of their sound behavioural and theoretical nature (10)(11)(12). In particular, comparing modelling results of MNL and ORL using several datasets, Bhat and Pulugurta (7) found substantial differences in the elasticities of exogenous variables across the choice probabilities of car ownership levels and identified misspecification problems associated with the ORL that could lead to incorrect and inaccurate forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, comparing modelling results of MNL and ORL using several datasets, Bhat and Pulugurta (7) found substantial differences in the elasticities of exogenous variables across the choice probabilities of car ownership levels and identified misspecification problems associated with the ORL that could lead to incorrect and inaccurate forecasts. Also, Potoglou and Kanaroglou (12) found that a MNL model was a significantly improved model over the ORL through a likelihood-ratio test between the two models using data from the metropolitan area of Hamilton, Canada. This paper offers a comprehensive comparison of car ownership models including MNL, ORL and ORP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%