2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling bank performance: A network DEA approach

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
95
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also would like to point out that other DEA methodologies have been used to assess the efficiency of banks; for example, Network DEA (e.g., Matthews 2013; Grigoroudis et al 2013;Akther et al 2013;Fukuyama and Matousek 2017;Gulati and Kumar 2017), Network DEA with undesirable variables (e.g., An et al 2015;Liu et al 2015), Dynamic DEA (e.g., Avkiran and Goto 2011;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017), Dynamic Network DEA (e.g., Avkiran 2015;Chao et al 2015;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017;Zha et al 2016;Wu et al 2016;Fukuyama and Weber 2017b), Fuzzy DEA (e.g., Wang et al 2014;Wanke et al 2016;Hatami-Marbini et al 2017), DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Ferrier and Hirschberg 1997), Fuzzy DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Wanke et al 2016), and Stochastic DEA (e.g., Kao and Liu 2009). For a recent survey, we refer the reader to Kaffash and Marra (2017).…”
Section: Landscape Of Research On Efficiency Assessment In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also would like to point out that other DEA methodologies have been used to assess the efficiency of banks; for example, Network DEA (e.g., Matthews 2013; Grigoroudis et al 2013;Akther et al 2013;Fukuyama and Matousek 2017;Gulati and Kumar 2017), Network DEA with undesirable variables (e.g., An et al 2015;Liu et al 2015), Dynamic DEA (e.g., Avkiran and Goto 2011;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017), Dynamic Network DEA (e.g., Avkiran 2015;Chao et al 2015;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017;Zha et al 2016;Wu et al 2016;Fukuyama and Weber 2017b), Fuzzy DEA (e.g., Wang et al 2014;Wanke et al 2016;Hatami-Marbini et al 2017), DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Ferrier and Hirschberg 1997), Fuzzy DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Wanke et al 2016), and Stochastic DEA (e.g., Kao and Liu 2009). For a recent survey, we refer the reader to Kaffash and Marra (2017).…”
Section: Landscape Of Research On Efficiency Assessment In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epure and Lafuente (2015) propose a bank performance model which separates desirable outputs into those outputs (loans) linked directly to joint undesirable by-products (NPL) and those desirable outputs (securities and service fees) not linked to undesirable outputs. Their model is extended by Fukuyama and Matousek (2015), who estimate a revenue function controlling for NPL incurred by Japanese regional banks. Fukuyama and Weber (2010) propose a two-stage network model for Japanese cooperative Shinkin banks.…”
Section: Bank Production Studies Controlling For Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banker et al [48] then relaxed the constant returns to scale hypothesis and developed a BCC model based on a variable return to scale assumption. The DEA method has been widely used for industrial efficiency analyses in the financial industry [49], the transportation industry [50], the service industry [51], and the manufacturing industry [52]. As environmental issues have become a greater public concern, applications have been developed [10,11] to measure energy and environmental efficiencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%