2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)81026-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Validating a multiple-configuration railway signalling system using SDL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular some first experiments, have been attempted, modeling in SDL some already produced systems [1,7], with specific attention to the issues of validation coverage [2] and of code generation [3].…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular some first experiments, have been attempted, modeling in SDL some already produced systems [1,7], with specific attention to the issues of validation coverage [2] and of code generation [3].…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If failure has occurred, the DIAGNOSTIC block will notify the LOOP MAIN to lead the system to a fail-safe state by sending all the processes a suitable reset signal. We refer to [14,15] for a more detailed description of the system and its SDL specification. To generate the C code, the SDL system has been reengineered avoiding some SDL constructs, such as FPARS, for process creation with parameters, and Continuous Signals, accordingly to Cmicro code generator restrictions.…”
Section: Railway Signalling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QUACK refined and extended the method, and evaluated the results by analyzing the SCA system (Sistema Conta Assi, axes counter system), described in [15]. SCA is a railway signaling device used to decide if a given railway section is free or still occupied by a train.…”
Section: Verification Of Non Functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An elaboration of the model described in [15] is presented in this volume in the paper by Banci et al [4].…”
Section: Verification Of Non Functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%