2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and testing spatially distributed sediment budgets to relate erosion processes to sediment yields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have also been reported for other locations by Walling (1988), Church & Slaymaker (1989), Lane et al (1997), Terajima et al (1996), Sichingabula (1998), Asselman (2000), Horowitz (2003), Sadeghi et al (2008a) and Wilkinson et al (2009). The poor correlation between SSC and Q data can be attributed to: variation in the temporal rainfall intensity distribution; suspended sediment supply from internal sources (i.e.…”
Section: Fitting the Ssc-q Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have also been reported for other locations by Walling (1988), Church & Slaymaker (1989), Lane et al (1997), Terajima et al (1996), Sichingabula (1998), Asselman (2000), Horowitz (2003), Sadeghi et al (2008a) and Wilkinson et al (2009). The poor correlation between SSC and Q data can be attributed to: variation in the temporal rainfall intensity distribution; suspended sediment supply from internal sources (i.e.…”
Section: Fitting the Ssc-q Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Comprehensive studies aim at a better understanding of the rainfall-soil erosion-runoff-sediment system as a whole, by integrating both natural and anthropogenic aspects at different temporal and spatial scales. This finally leads to a proper estimate of sediment yield needed for water management and erosion control structures, and river morphological and evaluation studies (Kothyari et al, 1997;Lana-Renault et al, 2007;Sadeghi et al, 2008b;Wilkinson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simplified approach focuses on the primary inputs and outputs in a section of a stream according to Wilkinson et al (2009), where the primary production process corresponds to the contribution of slope and channel erosion in the upper parts of the basin (Strahler order 1). Our main purpose was to provide a basis for comparative analyses of sediment retention in the tributary rivers of the Mompós 20 Depression for the different hydropower expansion scenarios; therefore, we do not provide a comprehensive description of the other components of the channel sediment balance, such as sediment production by lateral migration of the channel, or bank overflow events and sediment deposition.…”
Section: Sediment Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigations have presented empirical approaches relating sediment yield to catchment area, combined, or not, with other factors, such as basin shape, topography, runoff, lithology and vegetation cover (Walling, 1983;Church & Slaymaker, 1989;Verstraeten et al, 2003;de Vente et al, 2005;Minear & Kondolf, 2009). Others have presented distributed or semi-distributed hydro-sedimentological models such as WEPP (Flanagan et al, 1995;Ramsankaram et al, 2009), EUROSEM (Morgan et al, 1998;Mati et al, 2006), SWAT (Chen & Mackay, 2004;Rostamian et al, 2008), HIDROSED (de Araújo & Knight, 2005;de Araújo, 2007), WATEM/SEDEM (Verstraeten et al, 2007;de Vente et al, 2008) and SEDNET (Prosser et al, 2001;Wilkinson et al, 2009), for the assessment of soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale. However, none of the above-mentioned empirical approaches and hydro-sedimentological models deals with the HdRN problem, as in the case of large basins of the Brazilian semi-arid region.…”
Section: Fig 1 Upper Jaguaribe Basin-ujb (24 600 Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%