2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Simulation of Grinding Processes with Mounted Points: Part II of II - Fast Modelling Method for Workpiece Surface Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. 8 could overlay the aforementioned cutting edge profile of rotating grinding tool over plain work surface, to predict ground surface topography. Major steps involved in the process were to capture the cutting edge profile -position matrix of grinding tool and overlapping the same with work piece coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 8 could overlay the aforementioned cutting edge profile of rotating grinding tool over plain work surface, to predict ground surface topography. Major steps involved in the process were to capture the cutting edge profile -position matrix of grinding tool and overlapping the same with work piece coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can thus predict the surface roughness of ground or polished surfaces more accurately than Class #1. Uhlmann et al [18] used a class #2 model to predict surface roughness in a 4-axis grinding operation. • Class #3 considers the tool as a set of grains and takes into account the cutting action of each grain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%