2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and simulation of flow boiling with an Eulerian-Eulerian approach and integrated models for bubble dynamics and temperature-dependent heat partitioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, the boiling process still a considerably difficult problem compared to single phase flows because of the higher complexity of the physical phenomena involved (Kandlikar et al, 1999;Khan & Fartaj, 2010). Most of the studies dedicated to numerically simulate boiling flows have focused on techniques for accurate reproduction of the boiling phenomenon (Setoodeh et al, 2020;Bathi et al, 2020;Naghibzadeh et al, 2020). Therefore, little research has been done so far with the aim of exploring the geometric aspects of microchannels subjected to boiling flows.…”
Section: Reports In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the boiling process still a considerably difficult problem compared to single phase flows because of the higher complexity of the physical phenomena involved (Kandlikar et al, 1999;Khan & Fartaj, 2010). Most of the studies dedicated to numerically simulate boiling flows have focused on techniques for accurate reproduction of the boiling phenomenon (Setoodeh et al, 2020;Bathi et al, 2020;Naghibzadeh et al, 2020). Therefore, little research has been done so far with the aim of exploring the geometric aspects of microchannels subjected to boiling flows.…”
Section: Reports In Mechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the nucleation site density and bubble diameter significantly impact various key heat transfer parameters (e.g., volume fraction, liquid temperature), proposing that the best closure model is a combination of the empirical correlation of Lemmert and Chawla [26] for the nucleation site density, Unal [27] for the bubble detachment diameter, and Cole [28] for the bubble departure frequency. More recently, different numerical studies using the Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model for the prediction of various parameters have verified the use of different empirical model combinations of the wall partitioning model, depending on the working conditions [29][30][31][32]; however, they did not conclude a more global combination of the models that could be widely used. At this point it is also worth mentioning that the interfacial dynamics in the boiling heat transfer phenomena can also be modelled numerically with other techniques such as interface capturing methods (i.e., [33]) and mesh-less techniques such as the moving particle semi-implicit method (i.e., [34]); however, such techniques mainly focus on resolving the interface dynamics and are thus more applicable to studying local phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%