Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and simulation of affinity membrane adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this setup could systematically not explain specific features of chromatograms measured by the current authors with different porous membrane adsorbers [7,25,26]. Similar findings have also been reported elsewhere in the literature [14,27].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this setup could systematically not explain specific features of chromatograms measured by the current authors with different porous membrane adsorbers [7,25,26]. Similar findings have also been reported elsewhere in the literature [14,27].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In many studies, attempts have been made to quantitatively model different adsorption mechanisms [12], different binding isotherms [14,24] and the entire membrane chromatographic process, i.e., the mass transfer coupled with binding kinetics [11,13]. In these approaches, dead volumes in membrane chromatography systems are traditionally modeled by one plug flow reactor (PFR) and one continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in series [10,11], or by lumping the overall peak broadening and tailing effects into a fixed volume of a mixing cell [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects can be globally described by using a single PFR and a single CSTR in series, as shown in Refs. [24] and [31]. The same dispersion effects are present also when the membrane module is in place: in such a case, plain conformity to the system configuration would require to consider separately the system elements before and after the membrane module, which cannot be experimentally inspected individually without adding extra volumes.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This heterogeneous binding kinetics is similar to the one used by Wang and Carbonell for staphylococcal enterotoxin B adsorption onto a bio-mimetic affinity resin [23] and by Boi et al for IgG adsorption on mimetic A2P affinity membranes [24]. The above binding kinetics is used in the general simulation model for membrane chromatography which has been described in detail in a recent work [25], obtaining simulations suitable to describe the entire chromatographic cycle, including the behavior observed in breakthrough curves close to saturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Among them, affinity chromatography is the preferred choice for the primary capture step. This purification method is based on the specific interaction between the biomolecule of interest and a ligand immobilized on a solid support [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%