“…Several finding can be revealed as follows: (i) the city's energy structure tends to transition from coaldominated into diversity energy structure. Coal's consumption would decrease [10,12]%. While, natural gas would become the one of the most competitive resources, which with a growth rate of [74.2, 139.1]%; liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) would grow up 4 times over the planning horizon; (ii) coal-fired holds the dominant position, but its proportion would reduce from 81% in period 1 to 66% in period 3; (iii) traditional fossil fuels for traffic system would be limited and comparatively clean energy would be encouraged, gasoline and diesel consumptions from traffic system would decrease [16,24]% and [12,23]%, respectively; the comparatively clean energy resources (i.e., LPG, electric and hydrogen) would increase [15,23]% during the planning periods, which would contribute about [20,32]% [20,31]%, and 10% reductions in CO, HC and NOX emissions; (iv) SO2, NOx and PM10 emissions from electricity and heat generations would reduce [10.1, 11.2]%, [4.7, 9.6]% and [8.6, 8.7]% during the planning periods, because of the restriction of fossil fuels and the development of clean and renewable energy technologies.…”