2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Design of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Rotating Packed Bed and Packed Column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows higher flooding rate and lower interfacial mass transfer resistance resulting in significant reduction in the packed bed sizes. Recent studies have demonstrated prospects of replacing conventional packed beds in PCC with RPB (Agarwal et al 2010;Joel et al 2014;Thiels et al 2016). Agarwal et al (2010) and Joel et al (2014) reported 7 and 12 times packing volume reduction respectively for separate cases involving replacement of conventional packed bed with RPB for Absorbers in PCC based on chemical absorption.…”
Section: Commercial Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows higher flooding rate and lower interfacial mass transfer resistance resulting in significant reduction in the packed bed sizes. Recent studies have demonstrated prospects of replacing conventional packed beds in PCC with RPB (Agarwal et al 2010;Joel et al 2014;Thiels et al 2016). Agarwal et al (2010) and Joel et al (2014) reported 7 and 12 times packing volume reduction respectively for separate cases involving replacement of conventional packed bed with RPB for Absorbers in PCC based on chemical absorption.…”
Section: Commercial Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to mass transer limitations, large equipment is required to treat vast volumes of flue gas [38]. Several researchers have reported the use of monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent in carbon capture [34,39,40]. This requires high energy during regeneration [41] and reacts fast with CO 2 [42] compared to other solvents reported.…”
Section: Absorbent Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to lack of experimental data at these conditions, generating correlations from CFD simulation data could be an effective and economical alternative to meet the requirement of accurate prediction of the performance of the RPB for CO 2 capture. Among the existing correlations, the Burns correlation (Burns et al, 2000) describes the relationship between liquid holdup ( ) and the centrifugal acceleration (g), liquid superficial velocity (U) and viscosity ( ), which is concise and clear, and it has been adopted in many cases (Joel et al, 2015;Joel et al, 2014Joel et al, , 2017Kang et al, 2014;Thiels et al, 2016). Therefore, a similar expression has been adopted to regress the correlations for , A e and A s in the RPB with an expanded mesh packing based on the CFD simulation results.…”
Section: Effect Of the Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%