2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and control strategy development for fuel cell electric vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The battery, fuel cell, and traction motor models used here are described in reference [24]. Time delays due to hydrogen transport and fuel cell activation were not included in the fuel cell model because previous work has shown that simulation fidelity is not affected significantly by whether these delays are represented explicitly or not [23]. However, the dynamic lag between requested fuel cell power and actual fuel cell power delivered, which is important to performance, is incorporated in the form of a first order transfer function with a steady-state gain of 1 and time constant, 5.5 s. while the PV array model is based on reference [25].…”
Section: The Process: Component Description Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The battery, fuel cell, and traction motor models used here are described in reference [24]. Time delays due to hydrogen transport and fuel cell activation were not included in the fuel cell model because previous work has shown that simulation fidelity is not affected significantly by whether these delays are represented explicitly or not [23]. However, the dynamic lag between requested fuel cell power and actual fuel cell power delivered, which is important to performance, is incorporated in the form of a first order transfer function with a steady-state gain of 1 and time constant, 5.5 s. while the PV array model is based on reference [25].…”
Section: The Process: Component Description Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they are simple, such methods are computationally efficient and relatively cheap to implement, but have been shown to provide adequate power demand and battery SOC control while reducing hydrogen consumption [9][10][11][12][13][14]. In contrast, the second class of methods, which determine control action via optimization, have been shown to provide better overall performance (improved power demand and battery SOC control, and reduced hydrogen consumption) than rule-based methods [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, optimization methods, such as those that employ dynamic programming or Pontryagin's Minimum Principle, require a priori knowledge of the vehicle drive cycle, rendering them sub-optimal under unusual or unexpected driving conditions (e.g., hill climbing, lane changing, and abrupt starts and stops); furthermore, because of inherent complexity, these methods are computationally expensive and hence subject to high implementation costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel cell model was based on the mechanistic models [22,23]. It contains the open circuit voltage, activation loss, ohmic loss, and concentration loss models.…”
Section: Fuel Cell Stackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we expand upon state-of-the-art fuel cell vehicle modeling approaches [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] by coupling a system model with a detailed multiphysics single-cell model [22]. We introduce a multimethodology modeling and simulation approach for PEMFC performance and durability over realistic driving cycles and complete cell lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%