“…Several authors proposed algorithms and artefacts for the calibration of laser line scanners [3][4][5] Fig. 3: single sphere, steps, single or multiple edges, sphere-plane combinations, faceted sphere and doublecurved surfaces.…”
Section: Artefacts For Performance Evaluation Testsmentioning
a b s t r a c tThis paper presents a performance evaluation test for laser line scanners on 3D coordinate measuring machines (CMMs). Laser line scanners are becoming more popular in recent years, mainly for free form inspection tasks and reverse engineering. Error specification of these scanners is difficult because of many influencing factors like surface quality, surface orientation and scan depth. Therefore, procedures for evaluation and verification of conventional contact probes (e.g. touch-trigger probes) are not appropriate for non-contact laser line scanners. A straightforward test method that uses a planar test artefact is proposed. It enables to identify the influence of in-plane and out-of-plane angle, as well as scan depth on systematic and random errors of the laser scanner. Experimental results show that the tested commercial laser scanner, after calibration, exhibits systematic errors of about 10 mm.
“…Several authors proposed algorithms and artefacts for the calibration of laser line scanners [3][4][5] Fig. 3: single sphere, steps, single or multiple edges, sphere-plane combinations, faceted sphere and doublecurved surfaces.…”
Section: Artefacts For Performance Evaluation Testsmentioning
a b s t r a c tThis paper presents a performance evaluation test for laser line scanners on 3D coordinate measuring machines (CMMs). Laser line scanners are becoming more popular in recent years, mainly for free form inspection tasks and reverse engineering. Error specification of these scanners is difficult because of many influencing factors like surface quality, surface orientation and scan depth. Therefore, procedures for evaluation and verification of conventional contact probes (e.g. touch-trigger probes) are not appropriate for non-contact laser line scanners. A straightforward test method that uses a planar test artefact is proposed. It enables to identify the influence of in-plane and out-of-plane angle, as well as scan depth on systematic and random errors of the laser scanner. Experimental results show that the tested commercial laser scanner, after calibration, exhibits systematic errors of about 10 mm.
“…Guoyu et al presented an approach of modeling and calibration of an active laser beam-scanning triangulation system. They proposed a calibration method using the planar fitting algorithm, in which the required parameters were determined within an optimal framework through a planar fitting scheme [14].…”
“…To meet the requirement of accurate and efficent 3-D measurement, several types of non-contact sensors have been developed, such as laser beam probes [1,2] and structured-light sensors [3,4]. The laser beam sensor can be considered as a 1-D sensor that outputs a distance value from the zero reading point, while the structured-light sensor is a 2-D sensor, which has a 2-D coordinate system located on the laser plane, and the collected data have two coordinates.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.