2021
DOI: 10.3390/e23080927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Analysis of the Epidemic Model under Pulse Charging in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks

Abstract: With the development of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), energy constraints and network security have become the main problems. This paper discusses the dynamic of the Susceptible, Infected, Low-energy, Susceptible model under pulse charging (SILS-P) in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. After the construction of the model, the local stability and global stability of the malware-free T-period solution of the model are analyzed, and the threshold R0 is obtained. Then, using the comparison theorem and Floque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) If the residual energy of MC does not satisfy the charging demand of the next selected sensor, but it is enough to return to the depot, the MC is allowed to return to the depot to charge itself, and the charging time of the MC is ignored. (5) The charging decision of two adjacent time steps cannot be the same sensor or depot. (6) If the residual energy of the MC does not meet the charging demand for the next sensor, is not enough to return to the depot, or the preset network lifetime is reached, the charging plan will be ended no matter whether the sensors are still alive or not.…”
Section: States Of the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) If the residual energy of MC does not satisfy the charging demand of the next selected sensor, but it is enough to return to the depot, the MC is allowed to return to the depot to charge itself, and the charging time of the MC is ignored. (5) The charging decision of two adjacent time steps cannot be the same sensor or depot. (6) If the residual energy of the MC does not meet the charging demand for the next sensor, is not enough to return to the depot, or the preset network lifetime is reached, the charging plan will be ended no matter whether the sensors are still alive or not.…”
Section: States Of the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status information of sensors is highly controllable and predictable. Theoretically, WRSNs could work indefinitely under a well-designed charging scheme [ 5 ]. Therefore, the design of the charging scheme in WRSN is critical, and it has drawn extensive attention from the research community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered) model is adapted to study the spread of malware [22], while the SEIRS-V (susceptible-exposed-infected-recoveredsusceptible and vaccinated) model explores the application of Hopf bifurcation during the malware spreading [23,24]. With the development, the research on WRSNs was pushed forward recently [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], considering the new concept of L (low-energy status) nodes. It is worth noting that the transition from the low-energy status nodes to the normal status nodes is called charging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [26] proposed an energyefficient patching strategy to solve the problems of virus attacks and energy constraints. Liu et al [27,28] considered the impact of pulse charging and charging delay on the system. Keshri et al [29] proposed an SEIR model with two time delays (including the period exposed and the period of temporary immunity).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%