The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1243/1748006xjrr191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and analysis of risk and reliability for a contingency logistics supply chain

Abstract: Contingency logistic supply chain design and performance are very important for rare events such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and other emergency conditions. Although there is ample work on the evaluation of supply chain systems in terms of their profitability and efficiency, there is little work on the effectiveness of the response time of the supply chain, as well as quantitative measures for the robustness of the design and the reliability of the supply chain. Depending on the contingency, the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Miman and Pohl (2008), the definition of the failure probability for the base i (probability that the base i is mission incapable due to lack of enough materials to perform the mission) can be given through Eq.1. (Eq.1) can be derived by conditioning on S i (Assuming exponential supply and demand).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Miman and Pohl (2008), the definition of the failure probability for the base i (probability that the base i is mission incapable due to lack of enough materials to perform the mission) can be given through Eq.1. (Eq.1) can be derived by conditioning on S i (Assuming exponential supply and demand).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the demand is less than supply, the base is assumed to be capable to perform the assigned mission, hence it is reliable (Thomas, 2002;Thomas, 2004;Xiong et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018;Tubis et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016;Benyoucef et al, 2013). Miman and Pohl (2008) extends Thomas' work considering stocks to be hold by the base before a contingency occurs. Here, the base is assumed to be reliable if the demand it requires is less than the amount of stocks it holds plus the amount supplied to the base.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growing interest in analyzing risks to the supply chain stems from the fact that adverse events not only affect a single link in the logistics network but that their effects may be felt by both direct contractors and their downstream partners. 5 The literature highlights three primary sources of supply chain disruptions 6 : (1) random operational events, such as equipment failure, system deficiencies, and crew strikes, (2) natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes; (3) targeted actions aimed at causing disruption, including terrorism and political instability. It should also be noted that these disruptions may occur in the activities of individual links operating in the supply chain, that is, a manufacturer of finished products, suppliers at various stages of the supply chain, and distributors acting as intermediaries for the consumer market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 For this reason, numerous publications on the recent challenges of supply chain management address the assessment and risk management issues that exist in the current integrated systems. Researchers focus on undesirable events that may threaten to reduce the logistics service level in the supply chain (see Miman and Pohl 3 ). Moreover, the second research direction is connected with assessing the vulnerability of individual links to disruptions that occur within the framework of cooperation between partners (see Neureuther and Kenyon 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%