2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-009-9464-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Analysis of Planar Cell Polarity

Abstract: Access from the University of Nottingham repository:http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1002/1/ms_schamberg_PCP.pdf Copyright and reuse:The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the University of Nottingham End User licence and may be reused according to the conditions of the licence. For more details see: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the key molecular plays are very different, the collective polarization model that we have proposed has a similar mechanism of action as previous models of PCP (28,36). In both cases, cooperative and inhibitory interactions make possible spontaneous polarization, which can align across the cell and effectively propagate from a cell to its neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Although the key molecular plays are very different, the collective polarization model that we have proposed has a similar mechanism of action as previous models of PCP (28,36). In both cases, cooperative and inhibitory interactions make possible spontaneous polarization, which can align across the cell and effectively propagate from a cell to its neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Computational modeling has suggested that the cytoplasmic proteins play key roles in promoting feedback interactions between the core proteins (e.g., Amonlirdviman et al., 2005, Le Garrec et al., 2006, Burak and Shraiman, 2009, Schamberg et al., 2010). However, modulating their levels in puncta had no effect on core protein asymmetry (Figures 3O and 3P), indicating that feedback and generation of asymmetry does not depend on an exact ratio or concentration of particular cytoplasmic core proteins at the cell junctions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the core proteins can self-organize: clones of cells lacking Fz activity recruit core proteins to clone boundaries (Usui et al., 1999, Strutt, 2001), resulting in a reversal of polarity on one side of the clone, which can be propagated over several rows of cells (Vinson and Adler, 1987). Moreover, computational models have shown that positive and negative feedback interactions between the core proteins may be sufficient to amplify a slight bias in localization or activity of one of the proteins (e.g., Amonlirdviman et al., 2005, Le Garrec et al., 2006, Burak and Shraiman, 2009, Schamberg et al., 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model further suggested that a directional cue provided by Ft-Ds-Fj system is crucial for explaining the observed PCP patterns [21]; however, it did not elucidate how the Ft-Ds-Fj system as such generates this cue. Further, attempts at mathematical modeling of PCP captured the mechanism of action of the core proteins, and strengthened the idea that a weak tissue-level directional cue is important for obtaining the experimentally observed PCP patterns[23]–[30]. A recent phenomenological model proposes how Ft-Ds heterodimer formation in a group of cells in the tissue can induce collective polarization over the entire tissue; however, this model did not factor the crucial question of the role played by tissue-level expression gradients of Ds and Fj for the regulation of PCP [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%