2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and Analysis of an EN8 crankshaft material in comparison with Forged steel crankshaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed material EN19 is low-cost material as compared to EN8 and AISI E4340. comparison with previous studies [6][7][8][9] and current analysis shows EN19 is one of the alternative materials for crankshaft as it satisfies the all-strength requirements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposed material EN19 is low-cost material as compared to EN8 and AISI E4340. comparison with previous studies [6][7][8][9] and current analysis shows EN19 is one of the alternative materials for crankshaft as it satisfies the all-strength requirements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…There are so many materials for crankshaft out of which EN19 [5] is used. The FEA helps to find out stress and deformation [6][7][8][9][10] in structural components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using mechanical tests, the volume percentage of glass and banana fbre was estimated [34]. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the AISI 4130, EN8 forged steel composite materials and estimate the stress fuctuations [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%