2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-016-0426-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and analysis of agile manufacturing system by ISM and MICMAC analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents complex system in a visual hierarchical structure (Chang et al 2013;Borade and Bansod 2012) and transforms unclear, poorly articulated mental models of a system into visible, well defined hierarchical models (Alawamleh and Popplewell 2011;Jain and Raj 2015;Sindhwani and Malhotra 2016). ISM is primarily as a group learning process as interrelations among variables under study are decided based on group judgement (Gothwal and Raj 2015), but individuals may also apply it (Ravi and Shankar 2005;Faisal et al 2007).…”
Section: More Reliance On Imported Devices Leading To Increased Importsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents complex system in a visual hierarchical structure (Chang et al 2013;Borade and Bansod 2012) and transforms unclear, poorly articulated mental models of a system into visible, well defined hierarchical models (Alawamleh and Popplewell 2011;Jain and Raj 2015;Sindhwani and Malhotra 2016). ISM is primarily as a group learning process as interrelations among variables under study are decided based on group judgement (Gothwal and Raj 2015), but individuals may also apply it (Ravi and Shankar 2005;Faisal et al 2007).…”
Section: More Reliance On Imported Devices Leading To Increased Importsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the said approach has been used by authors to model variables in various fields of studies, i.e. such as competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sector (Dewangan et al , 2015); agile manufacturing system (Sindhwani and Malhotra, 2017); SC (Sujan et al , 2020); healthcare service (Kumar et al , 2019); software process improvement in software SMEs (Sharma and Sangal, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey questionnaire was designed to attain the research objectives. The variables included in the questionnaire were adopted from the elaborated literature review (Ren et al , 2003; Dowlatshahi and Cao, 2006; Vazquez-Bustelo et al , 2007; Hallgren and olhager, 2009; Hasan et al , 2009; Eshlaghy et al , 2010; AL-Tahat and Bataineh, 2012; Saleeshya and Babu, 2012; Mishra et al , 2013; Aravindraj and Vinodh, 2014; Dubey and Gunasekaran, 2015; Routroy et al , 2015; Samantra et al , 2015; Leite and Braz, 2016; Kumar et al , 2017; Sindhwani and Malhotra, 2017; Potdar and Routroy, 2017; Nabass and Abdallah, 2018) and validated through discussion held with practitioners, academicians and the industry. The suggestions given by them have been incorporated into the questionnaire to make it more useful and relevant to research objectives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agile manufacturing systems are capable of producing high-quality and low-unit cost products in compressed time, even in smaller quantities (Garbie et al , 2008). It favors modular design approach (Gunasekaran, 1999; Dowlatshahi and Cao, 2006; Sindhwani and Malhotra, 2017). Agile manufacturing has received increasing attention from both academicians and industry professionals, and developed gradually from a niche topic into a broad cross-disciplinary research area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%