2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and analysis of a Romanesque church under earthquake loading: Assessment of seismic resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be referred that the values presented in Table 3 may be presented in other terms, more precisely the cohesion and friction angle values, respectively, 7.7 kPa and 38 • , similar to values found in literature (e.g. Cavicchi and Gambarotta 2005;Betti and Vignoli 2008).…”
Section: Non Linear Model Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It should be referred that the values presented in Table 3 may be presented in other terms, more precisely the cohesion and friction angle values, respectively, 7.7 kPa and 38 • , similar to values found in literature (e.g. Cavicchi and Gambarotta 2005;Betti and Vignoli 2008).…”
Section: Non Linear Model Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In FIGURE 5 the deformed shapes near collapse provided by pushover analyses, with indication of the location of control points and the corresponding pushover curves (on the right) are also represented to give an idea of the active failure mechanisms and the amount of displacement reached by the different nodes monitored during the analyses. Only X-and Y-load cases are shown for the sake of conciseness, but it is interesting to notice that failure mechanisms are always local, a peculiar behavior for such kind of structures [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Similar results are found by the authors for the seismic load applied along the positive directions of the geometric axes (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A correct estimation of their load carrying capacity against horizontal loads should be therefore considered mandatory to guarantee their safeguard, allowing focusing restoration interventions on the base of quantitative information and on the expected structural behaviour in occasion of earthquakes. In the technical literature, several advanced numerical approaches are available for single case studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiostrini et al [23] combined the DP and the WW criteria to reproduce the results of several diagonal tests on masonry specimens, obtaining good agreement with experimental values. Betti and Vignoli combine the DP and the WW criteria to discuss the seismic vulnerability of a masonry church [15,30]. The cohesion c and the internal friction angle φ are the two material parameters required to define the DP yield surface.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%