1999
DOI: 10.1680/iwtme.1999.31265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling a River Channel With Distant Floodbanks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-dimensional models (see e.g. Fread, 1984Fread, , 1993Samuels, 1990;Ervine and MacLeod, 1999) describe the river channel and floodplain as a series of cross-sections perpendicular to the flow direction. Numerical solution of the controlling equations for prescribed inflow and outflow boundary conditions then enables the cross-section averaged velocity and water depth at each location to be calculated.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-dimensional models (see e.g. Fread, 1984Fread, , 1993Samuels, 1990;Ervine and MacLeod, 1999) describe the river channel and floodplain as a series of cross-sections perpendicular to the flow direction. Numerical solution of the controlling equations for prescribed inflow and outflow boundary conditions then enables the cross-section averaged velocity and water depth at each location to be calculated.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models have been criticised not only because of the expectation that representation of floodplain flow as a two-dimensional (2D) flow interacting with the channel flow will give more accurate predictions of flood wave propagation Aronica et al, 1998;Bates et al, 1992;Bates et al, 1998;Cunge, 1975;Dutta et al, 2000;Ervine and MacLeod, 1999;Gee et al, 1990;Hromadka et al, 1985), but also for the usage of the Manning equation (which can be also a criticism for higher dimensional models). This flow equation is computed:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Trieste and Jarrett, 1987) have demonstrated discrepancies between calibrated effective model values and roughnesses which have been estimated based only on the nature of the channel and flood plain surfaces, despite many sources of guidance about how to choose a value, such as photographs (Arcement and Schneider, 1989;Chow et al, 1988), tables (Chadwick and Morfett, 1999;Chow, 1959;Chow et al, 1988;King, 1918), composite formulae (Barkau, 1997;Bathurst, 1994;Dingman and Sharma, 1997;Knight et al, 1989;Li and Zhang, 2001; Rice et al, 1998;Riggs, 1976) or measurement programs (Ackers, 1991;Dingman and Sharma, 1997;Ervine and MacLeod, 1999;Harunurrashid, 1990). These estimates have usually been based on velocities measured for local velocity profiles or across a single cross-section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, these St. Venant equations can be simplified even further to the one dimensional form (Fread, 1984;Ervine and MacLeod, 1999), where flow momentum is conserved between two cross sections. These 1D equations are expressed as:…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodology For Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%