2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling 3D crack propagation in hard rock pillars using a synthetic rock mass approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D 32 on the other hand is used to provide a measure of the volumetric density of fracturing within the damaged zone. 12 A series of simulations were conducted to investigate the influence of increasing groundwater level on the failure mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D 32 on the other hand is used to provide a measure of the volumetric density of fracturing within the damaged zone. 12 A series of simulations were conducted to investigate the influence of increasing groundwater level on the failure mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SJM is a method of inserting joints into the particle assembly in order to overcome the particle bumpiness for smooth sliding between two particles. 11,12 The code uses an explicit solution scheme suitable for simulation of highly nonlinear behaviour such as fracture, slip and opening/closing of joints. 10 For example, Lorig et al 13 used Slope Model to simulate failure of intact rock bridges in high rock slopes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely attributed to its ability of explicitly simulating rock crack propagation . Recently, a Synthetic Rock Mass (SRM) method is developed to quantify mechanical properties of jointed rock mass . The SRM is an integrated model incorporating a discrete fracture network (DFN) within a Particle Flow Code 3D (PFC3D) particle assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in Civil Engineering et al [29], Pierce et al [30], Elmo and Stead [31], Wang et al [32], Zhang and Stead [33], and Vallejos et al [34], which have simulated the increasing specimen size of the jointed rockmass leading to an apparent decrease in the strength. eir results indicate that the SRM method is valid and suitable for studying the strength behavior of the rockmass.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%