2005
DOI: 10.1108/09615530510583874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelization of combined radiative and conductive heat transfer in three‐dimensional complex enclosures

Abstract: Purpose -To provide a finite volume code, based on Cartesian coordinates, for studying combined conductive and radiative heat transfer in three-dimensional irregular geometries. Design/methodology/approach -In the present study, a three-dimensional blocked-off-region procedure was presented and implemented in a numerical code based on the finite volume method to model combined conductive and radiative heat transfer in complex geometries. This formulation was developed and tested in three-dimensional complex en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The present results show comparable accuracy with those presented by Guedri et al [21] and the finite element method solutions in the work of Razzaque et al [27].…”
Section: Test Problem 2 (Conduction-radiation Validation)supporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4. The present results show comparable accuracy with those presented by Guedri et al [21] and the finite element method solutions in the work of Razzaque et al [27].…”
Section: Test Problem 2 (Conduction-radiation Validation)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The medium is further assumed to absorb and emit radiation with k = 1 m -1 , but not scatter radiant energy, w = 0. This test problem has been solved in the work of Guedri et al [21]. They used finite volume method to model combined conductive and radiative heat transfer.…”
Section: Test Problem 2 (Conduction-radiation Validation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the STEP scheme, [20][21][22][23][24]34 the radiation intensity I f depends on one grid node where I f = I C for positive direction (Fig. 2a).…”
Section: Basic Spatial Discretization Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the CPU time of NVD schemes is about 2.92 to 5.26 times higher than that of the STEP scheme for the coarse spatial grid, and decreases to about 2.49 to 4.72 times higher for the finer spatial grid. However, it has been demonstrated, by several researchers, 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]34 that in the case when grey walls are considered, the STEP scheme requires an iterative solution, and its computational requirement becomes comparable to that of high-order schemes. It is also noted that the CPU time consumed increases with an increase of the optical thickness of the medium.…”
Section: Cube Enclosure Filled With Absorbing-emitting Nonscattering mentioning
confidence: 99%