Modélisation conceptuelle de l’information bibliographique et muséologique : CIDOC CRM et FRBRoo

Bœuf, Patrick Le

doi:10.7202/1029185ar

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CIDOC CRM is an international standard (ISO 21127:2014), the overall scope of which is summarised in simple terms as the ‘curated knowledge of museums’; in practice, it is a reference model expressed in terms of the current reference standards for museum documentation [22]. It enables mediation between different sources of cultural heritage information and is extensible; it has been extended by English Heritage to the archaeological domain, for example, the STAR project 3 and ARIADNE’s CRMarchaeo project for modelling the archaeological excavation process.…”

Section: Tools Of Ontology Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

From mud to the museum: Metadata challenges in archaeology

Henninger

2017

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An archaeological site is a palimpsest in which the evidence of the depositional episodes is destroyed through the excavation processes; all that remains are the artefacts and their documentary evidence manifested in registers, datasets, dig diaries and reports. While the reports may represent the end product of a specific excavation, the archaeological record tells a story; it is interpretative and dynamic, with later excavations adding new knowledge and narratives. Museums preserve the artefacts but unless the documentary evidence is preserved in standard formats, it cannot be easily re-used by the archaeology community to create that knowledge; nor can museums provide the narratives for the general public whose cultural heritage it is. This article presents a case study from the Ness of Brodgar excavations that examines possibilities for reconciling one part of the data of an archaeological dig, the small finds register (SFR) and its sparse amount of descriptive metadata, with the potentiality of data re-use and with the requirements of a museum that may have custody of the artefacts. It maps and enriches messy domain-specific ontologies to standard archaeological and cultural heritage ontologies and taxonomies using simple natural language processing, linked open data and the museum CIDOC conceptual reference model (CRM). This research, in examining the application of ontology mapping tools, explores common practices and processes that are useful in any discipline within the cultural heritage domain.

show abstract

Section: Tools Of Ontology Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

From mud to the museum: Metadata challenges in archaeology

Henninger

2017

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Modélisation conceptuelle de l’information bibliographique et muséologique : CIDOC CRM et FRBRoo

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

From mud to the museum: Metadata challenges in archaeology

From mud to the museum: Metadata challenges in archaeology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About