1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling zenith-angle dependence of outgoing longwave radiation: Implication for flux measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the radiation emitted from the atmosphere was isotropic, F = πL could be established. However, because this radiation is actually anisotropic, the radiance observed from the satellite's VZA must be converted to irradiance [1]. Therefore, the equation given below is used to convert the narrowband radiance observed on the AHI channel into narrowband irradiance (Equations (1)-(3)).…”
Section: Converting Radiance To Irradiancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the radiation emitted from the atmosphere was isotropic, F = πL could be established. However, because this radiation is actually anisotropic, the radiance observed from the satellite's VZA must be converted to irradiance [1]. Therefore, the equation given below is used to convert the narrowband radiance observed on the AHI channel into narrowband irradiance (Equations (1)-(3)).…”
Section: Converting Radiance To Irradiancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere (TOA OLR) is an indicator that can describe the overall state of the earth-atmosphere system [1][2][3][4]. Also, OLR is an important radiation budget when balanced with net shortwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere and used in climate studies related to energy balance [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the EAV method performs better in SW clear and cloudy land scenes and EAT obtains better comparisons in the LW regime and over SW permanent snow scenes. The better results obtained in the LW domain by EAT were expected, since the oblique views around 55° are known to provide the most accurate LW flux estimations (Otterman et al 1997) and the EAT method reduces significantly the weighting of the nadir view (less than 4% while the obhque views account for the 96% of the effective radiance).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The results do not show large differences in the TOA flux retrievals because of the smooth anisotropic nature of LW radiance field. The lowest error is associated with the observation at 50° because of the low dependence on the scene type and the reduced anisotropic effect around this angle [ Bodas‐Salcedo et al , 2003; Otterman et al , 1997]. On the other hand, as expected the worst inversion is obtained for the nadir view.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%