2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling wellbore heat exchangers: Fully numerical to fully analytical solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While authors in (Falcone et al, 2018) used constant water properties, T2Well uses the pressure and temperature dependent thermophysical properties based on models suggested by the International Formulation Committee (IFC, 1967). As stated in (Sui et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2019), constant fluid properties seem to generate errors in the pressure losses calculation and heat produced in DBHEs. The produced water temperature and heat flux were underestimated for a DBHE of 6100m and overestimated by 11% in a DBHE of 3500m (Hu et al, 2020).…”
Section: T2well Numerical Validation Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While authors in (Falcone et al, 2018) used constant water properties, T2Well uses the pressure and temperature dependent thermophysical properties based on models suggested by the International Formulation Committee (IFC, 1967). As stated in (Sui et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2019), constant fluid properties seem to generate errors in the pressure losses calculation and heat produced in DBHEs. The produced water temperature and heat flux were underestimated for a DBHE of 6100m and overestimated by 11% in a DBHE of 3500m (Hu et al, 2020).…”
Section: T2well Numerical Validation Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right -Well completion diagram of the DBHE interpreted from (Cladouhos et al, 2016). Both depict the casing and cement sections at appropriate elevations in T2Well/EOS1, interpreted from (Tang et al, 2019;Toth, 2015).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytical DBHE models have shown good performances for an optimization analysis but overestimate the pressures losses at low mass flow rate and underestimate them at higher mass flow rate, compared to numerical models [21]. Numerical methods have been established as the most accurate approach, notably for modelling early transient time processes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, constant water properties have been applied to estimate the heat transfer in DBHEs [10], but constant fluid properties are known to lead to errors in pressure losses calculations [21]. Density variations can have an impact on the thermosiphon-effect, as it compensates pressure losses due to density variations of the ascending and injecting working fluid [22], and surface pressure from the internal tubing can be higher than the pressure at the injection point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%