2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling visual attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied psychophysical assessment tools that are based on the theory of visual attention (TVA, Bundesen, 1990;Bundesen, Habekost, & Kyllingsbaek, 2005;Kyllingsbaek, 2006). These tools deliver, from the same set of trials, a variety of perceptual and attentional parameters that characterize several basic aspects of the individual visual attention performance of participants in a way that is free of possible influences from the motor response system.The latter is important because differences in motor response speed may also obscure differences in attention processes between video gamers and non-gamers (e.g., Castel et al, 2005;Dye et al, 2009).…”
Section: Theory Of Visual Attention and Video Game Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied psychophysical assessment tools that are based on the theory of visual attention (TVA, Bundesen, 1990;Bundesen, Habekost, & Kyllingsbaek, 2005;Kyllingsbaek, 2006). These tools deliver, from the same set of trials, a variety of perceptual and attentional parameters that characterize several basic aspects of the individual visual attention performance of participants in a way that is free of possible influences from the motor response system.The latter is important because differences in motor response speed may also obscure differences in attention processes between video gamers and non-gamers (e.g., Castel et al, 2005;Dye et al, 2009).…”
Section: Theory Of Visual Attention and Video Game Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed formal description and the equations of TVA can be found in Kyllingsbaek (2006). On this view, visual objects are processed in parallel and compete for selection.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there were six different trial conditions (3 exposure durations×2 masking conditions), with 16 trials for each of the six conditions, presented in randomised order. From the whole-report functions, the TVA parameters for visual vSTM storage capacity and processing speed were then derived individually for each participant (see Kyllingsbaek 2006).…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six-target whole-report trials were presented for 10, 20, 50, 80, 140, and 200 ms. The two-target whole-report trials and the partialreport trials were presented for 80 ms. TVA modelling procedures (Dyrholm, Kyllingsbaek, Espeseth & Bundesen, 2011;Kyllingsbaek, 2006) were applied to estimate the following parameters for each participant:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VSTM system is conceived as a feedback mechanism that sustains activity in the neurons that have won the attentional competition. NTVA accounts both for a wide range of attentional effects in human performance (error rates and reaction times) and a wide range of effects observed in single cells (firing rates) in the primate visual system (for an overview, see Bundesen & Habekost, 2008;Kyllingsbaek, 2006). TVA has laid the foundation for TVA-based assessment of attentional functions, which has many advantages as compared with conventional clinical tests of visual attention: Performance is analysed into separate functional components (specificity); the method can reveal deficits that go undetected by conventional clinical testing (sensitivity); the measurement error can be quantified, and in most cases shown to be minor (reliability); and the measures that are obtained are not bound to the tasks used, but grounded in a general theory of visual attention (validity).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%