2020
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Variation in the Reproductive Lifespan of Female Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Using AMH

Abstract: Abstract Context Many female survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers (AYA survivors) have shortened reproductive lifespans. However, the timing and duration of ovarian function after cancer treatment are largely unknown. Objective To model the trajectory o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, predicting their reproductive life span remains challenging and will require additional longitudinal studies controlled for cancer type, age of cancer diagnosis, and treatment regimen. A recent study by Su et al ( 96 ), analyzing survivors of breast cancer, thyroid cancer, and lymphoma is one of the first studies starting to address these limitations. AMH trajectories indeed differed based on the gonadotoxic effect of the treatment.…”
Section: Assessment Of the For After Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, predicting their reproductive life span remains challenging and will require additional longitudinal studies controlled for cancer type, age of cancer diagnosis, and treatment regimen. A recent study by Su et al ( 96 ), analyzing survivors of breast cancer, thyroid cancer, and lymphoma is one of the first studies starting to address these limitations. AMH trajectories indeed differed based on the gonadotoxic effect of the treatment.…”
Section: Assessment Of the For After Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMH trajectories indeed differed based on the gonadotoxic effect of the treatment. While treatment at younger age resulted in higher AMH trajectories, this protective effect was nullified upon treatment with high gonadotoxic agents ( 96 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of the For After Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMH levels show this recovery. When modeling AMH in cancer survivors, levels are initially low immediately post-treatment then rise to peak between 2 and 3 years later ( 35 ). Prospective studies in women with breast cancer (median age 41), as discussed above, show both a marked fall versus pretreatment levels and minimal recovery of AMH levels over several years thereafter ( 25 ), while a comparable study in younger women with lymphoma (mean age 24) showed a clear divergence of the pattern of AMH levels by different chemotherapy regimens, with robust recovery of AMH levels in women treated with ABVD versus very limited recovery in women treated with high doses of alkylating agents ( 36 ).…”
Section: Measuring Amh After Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second study reported the slope of change in AMH over approximately 3 years in long-term childhood cancer survivors (median of 16 years since cancer treatment) was similar to women without cancer ( 38 ). Taken together, although AMH levels will on average be lower in a cancer survivor than a woman without cancer, there may be a long duration of relative stability with a plateau over 10 to 15 years prior to decline rather than a rapid decline for many young women who are cancer survivors ( 35 ). This is very reassuring for such patients, although additional detail is needed to confirm that this applies across the range of AMH levels.…”
Section: Measuring Amh After Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been demonstrated in prepubertal girls, in young adults, and in older premenopausal women, but generally in relatively small studies, particularly when prospective and mostly with less than a 5-year follow-up. The question of the longer-term function of the chemotherapy-exposed ovary therefore remains very uncertain, and it is this that Su and colleagues have investigated in a paper in the current edition of the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism ( 7 ). The study recruited women who had been diagnosed with cancer from the ages of 18 to 39 who were on the registries of 2 US states or were known to participating research centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%