2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44682-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling User Preferences and Mediating Agents in Electronic Commerce

Abstract: An important ingredient in agentmediated Electronic Commerce is the presence of intelligent agents that assist Electronic Commerce participants (e.g., individual users, other agents, organisations). These mediating agents are in principle autonomous agents that will interact with their environments (e.g. other agents and webservers) on behalf of the participants who have delegated tasks to them. For mediating agents a (preference) model of these participants is indispensable. In this paper, a generic mediatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The task is then to find a hypothesis that, together with B, covers all the positive examples but none of the negative examples. While in previous work ILP systems such as TILDE (Blockeel and De Raedt 1998) and Aleph (Srinivasan 2001) have been applied to preference learning (Dastani et al 2001;Horváth 2012), this has addressed learning ratings, such as good , poor and bad , rather than rankings over the examples. Ratings are not expressive enough if we want to find an optimal solution as we may rate many objects as good when some are better than others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task is then to find a hypothesis that, together with B, covers all the positive examples but none of the negative examples. While in previous work ILP systems such as TILDE (Blockeel and De Raedt 1998) and Aleph (Srinivasan 2001) have been applied to preference learning (Dastani et al 2001;Horváth 2012), this has addressed learning ratings, such as good , poor and bad , rather than rankings over the examples. Ratings are not expressive enough if we want to find an optimal solution as we may rate many objects as good when some are better than others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Choudhury [9] analyzes past activities of online groups in order to predict future activities. Dastani et al [13] predict user preferences based on their e-commerce activities. Choudhury et al [8] propose a method for forecasting the flow of communication in online communities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 To do this, the notification agent needs to have a profile for the user. This profile can be obtained in many different ways: through observing the user's behavior [15], through direct elicitation techniques [114], or through inductive logic programming techniques [28]. Once the profile is installed in the agent, it can notify the user whenever an appropriate good/service becomes available (i.e., the user's profile matches a good/ service catalog).…”
Section: Need Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The semantic Web provides a new solution for the development of Web-based intelligent agents. There are two semantic Web languages: Resource Description Framework (RDF) 28 and Darpa Agent Markup Language (DAML).…”
Section: Interaction Languages and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%