32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling turbomachinery unsteadiness with lumped deterministic stresses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LDST technique has been used in this latter fashion by Sondak et al 1 and Busby et al 2 to model rotor-stator interaction unsteadiness in turbomachinery. They performed unsteady inviscid simulations to extract the lumped deterministic stress field and then applied it as a source term in steady viscous calculations to model unsteady flow effects.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LDST technique has been used in this latter fashion by Sondak et al 1 and Busby et al 2 to model rotor-stator interaction unsteadiness in turbomachinery. They performed unsteady inviscid simulations to extract the lumped deterministic stress field and then applied it as a source term in steady viscous calculations to model unsteady flow effects.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have been made on this and then various models have been proposed in recent years [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. These studies showed that the models employed in the APES obviously improve the numerical results in comparison with mixing plane method.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only DC in momentum equations was modeled in some models [7,9,10], though there is also DC in energy equation. Some models [5,6] are reducedorder models, belonging to simplified unsteady calculations and are still too time consuming in comparison with the mixing plane method. Hence, more research work should be conducted to study the influence of DC on the time-averaged flow and to model the DC.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li & Tourlidakis [5] improved this model by introducing the blade blockage through a different approach for the body force modeling and concluded that the implementation of the deterministic stresses is beneficial to the flow prediction but the improvement in accuracy for low-speed axial flow compressor rear stages is not significant. Sondak et al [6] developed a "lumped" DC model based on lower-order (inviscid) time-dependent simulations and the model saved 63 % CPU time compared with that based on a fully coupled unsteady viscous simulation. He [7] developed a nonlinear harmonic method, showing that this method is much more efficient than the nonlinear time-marching methods while still modeling dominant nonlinear effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%