2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Tumor Clonal Evolution for Drug Combinations Design

Abstract: Cancer is a clonal evolutionary process. This presents challenges for effective therapeutic intervention, given the constant selective pressure towards drug resistance. Mathematical modeling from population genetics, evolutionary dynamics, and engineering perspectives are being increasingly employed to study tumor progression, intratumoral heterogeneity, drug resistance, and rational drug scheduling and combinations design. In this review, we discuss promising opportunities these inter-disciplinary approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Put together with cell-cycle data (which could be done at diagnosis and throughout treatment if needed by assessment of S-phase or cyclin expression by flow cytometry), PK/PD combined models are being developed to optimize chemotherapy dose and schedule according to anticipated clonal output [8,44]. With this method, there is the potential to tailor treatments by manipulating leukaemic heterogeneity and instilling longterm control of tumour growth, limiting expansion of more pathogenic clones [36,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put together with cell-cycle data (which could be done at diagnosis and throughout treatment if needed by assessment of S-phase or cyclin expression by flow cytometry), PK/PD combined models are being developed to optimize chemotherapy dose and schedule according to anticipated clonal output [8,44]. With this method, there is the potential to tailor treatments by manipulating leukaemic heterogeneity and instilling longterm control of tumour growth, limiting expansion of more pathogenic clones [36,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at times of diagnosis), and assumed that the population is well-mixed and contains pre-existing resistant subpopulations. While stochastic drift and background mutation rates are also important driving forces in clonal evolution and resistance12, we are interested here in regimes where there already exists resistant subpopulation(s) prior to drug treatment. This has been clinically observed in a number of studies4678, where, while the pre-existing resistant cells are in the minority, the subpopulation size is still substantial enough that selection is the dominating driving process in resistance36.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing of clinical data and quantitative modeling approaches have shown tumor clonal evolution to be highly dynamic, with minor subclones oftentimes selected for during drug treatment345678. Such drug-imposed selective pressures can affect the trajectories of evolution, and further, can be in competition with various other processes, such as background mutation rates, fitness of the resulting mutations, and clonal cooperativity/interference9101112.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance can arise via several mechanisms, including the selection of pre-existing resistant subclones, de novo or acquired resistance, and “competitive release”, wherein elimination of treatment sensitive cells results in a substantial reduction of tumor burden and a small population where resistant clones can readily grow out without competition [262]. Hence, the interplay between cancer cell population size and their ecological niche impacts treatment response.…”
Section: Evolutionary Strategies To Exploit Intra-tumor Heterogenementioning
confidence: 99%