2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Tsunami Induced Debris Impacts on Bridge Structures using the Material Point Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang [41] studied the tsunami-induced debris loading on bridge decks using the material point method. The results of the analyses showed that the presence of debris increases the applied loads on bridges, with the in-water analyses giving up to 35% larger debris impact forces than the in-air cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang [41] studied the tsunami-induced debris loading on bridge decks using the material point method. The results of the analyses showed that the presence of debris increases the applied loads on bridges, with the in-water analyses giving up to 35% larger debris impact forces than the in-air cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we investigate the material point method 1 (MPM), a mixed Lagrangian‐Eulerian simulation approach that has been applied to a wide range of continuum mechanics problems. The MPM was originally proposed as a method for simulating history‐dependent, solid‐like materials through extremely large deformations but has also been applied to fluid‐like materials, 2 multi‐phase mixtures, 3,4 and phase change problems 5 . There are two basic interpretations of the MPM: (i) as an extension of the particle‐in‐cell (PIC) and fluid implicit particle (FLIP) methods 6‐8 or (ii) as a mixed Petrov‐Galerkin finite element method (FEM) using reduced quadrature 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the material point method for simulating fluid flows 2,3,46‐51 is becoming increasingly common, especially in the fields of physics‐based animation and free‐surface simulation. To model such flows, an MPM implementation must address two key issues: (i) volumetric or kinematic locking of nearly incompressible materials 47,51,52 and (ii) accumulation of discretization and quadrature errors through advection 53,54 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as explained by Bing et al [35], the dual-grid configuration is problematic even for simple 1D problems, since it is sensitive to different boundary cell size and location. Mast's colleague, Yang [36], proposed a scheme for handling nonconforming Dirichlet boundaries by giving a specific boundary force field. This technique defines an influence region nearby the boundary, divided into three zones: constrained, decay, and free.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%