2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling tooth enamel in FEA comparisons of skulls: Comparing common simplifications with biologically realistic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2010), tooth material properties (Herbst et al . 2021), and jaw kinematics during mastication (Kuninori et al . 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2010), tooth material properties (Herbst et al . 2021), and jaw kinematics during mastication (Kuninori et al . 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the mechanical properties of these internal structures, like dentine has been found to vary with tooth height [ 91 ]. Future studies should employ micro-CT to create canine tooth models with accurate differences in the thickness and distribution of enamel and dentine or the size of the pulp cavity, which may help to reveal structural mechanisms among species that help counter stresses, similar to previous studies on fish and reptile taxa, and humans [ 38 , 92 , 93 ]. Moreover, the path of a canine tooth during a bite is not unidirectional, as we modelled in our static simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These values were averages of the published values for rodent enamel and dentine 28 as the two tissues were not distinguished during the segmentation process as a consequence of insufficient CT resolution in some specimens. Furthermore, it has been noted that representation of separate dental tissues in FE models has very limited impact on overall stress distributions 35 . Post-incisor dentition was not segmented as a separate material from bone as the focus of this study was directly on variation in mechanical strength of the mandible as a result of changes in incisor length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%