2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-32032/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the β-secretase cleavage site and humanizing amyloid-beta precursor protein in rat and mouse to study Alzheimer’s Disease.

Abstract: BackgroundThree amino acid differences between rodent and human APP affect medically important features, including β-secretase cleavage of APP and Aβ peptide aggregation(1–3). Most rodent models for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are, therefore, based on the human APP sequence, expressed from artificial mini-genes randomly inserted in the rodent genome. While these models mimic rather well various biochemical aspects of the disease, such as Aβ-aggregation, they are also prone to overexpression artifacts and to compl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make an important distinction between these fAD-like models that resemble the genetic state of human fAD as closely as possible and other knock-in models that invoke genetic states which have never been observed in human fAD (e.g. models possessing homozygous mutations that have only been observed in a heterozygous state in humans and/or several fAD-causative mutations simultaneously as described by Saito et al [51] or Serneels et al [52]). Despite the comparatively more subtle pathology seen in fAD-like knock-in models, because they more closely mimic the genetic state of fAD, it would be expected that gene expression analysis of knock-in models may reveal informative early molecular changes that are relevant to early fAD states in human brains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make an important distinction between these fAD-like models that resemble the genetic state of human fAD as closely as possible and other knock-in models that invoke genetic states which have never been observed in human fAD (e.g. models possessing homozygous mutations that have only been observed in a heterozygous state in humans and/or several fAD-causative mutations simultaneously as described by Saito et al [51] or Serneels et al [52]). Despite the comparatively more subtle pathology seen in fAD-like knock-in models, because they more closely mimic the genetic state of fAD, it would be expected that gene expression analysis of knock-in models may reveal informative early molecular changes that are relevant to early fAD states in human brains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these rat models, which are with single App mutation leading to little Aβ deposits, do not exhibit significant AD pathologies. [39][40][41][42] Accordingly, it is highly desirable to develop alternative models that can faithfully recapitulate majority of the pathogenic mechanisms in AD using knock-in technology. In this study, we have generated an App knock-in rat line harboring Swedish-Beyreuther/ Iberian-Arctic mutations using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse APP differs in sequence from the human protein. In the amyloid-β region these differences both reduce the protein’s cleavage by β-secretase and the tendency of the amyloid-β generated to aggregate [14] thus limiting our ability to determine how changes to biology affect accumulation of amyloid-β – a key early aspect of AD. Whereas the over- and mis-expression of APP in transgenic mouse models may cause artefactual phenotypes, masking the modulatory effect of the extra copy of Hsa21 genes and causing elevated mortality which may confound data interpretation [13, 15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%