2023
DOI: 10.1017/dce.2023.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the wall shear stress in large-eddy simulation using graph neural networks

Abstract: As the Reynolds number increases, the large-eddy simulation (LES) of complex flows becomes increasingly intractable because near-wall turbulent structures become increasingly small. Wall modeling reduces the computational requirements of LES by enabling the use of coarser cells at the walls. This paper presents a machine-learning methodology to develop data-driven wall-shear-stress models that can directly operate, a posteriori, on the unstructured grid of the simulation. The model architecture is based on gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value implies that edge and node features that are within a distance up to N = 4 neighbors away from a given target wall node will influence the prediction. This value was found to be sufficient to discriminate non-equilibrium regions in Dupuy et al (2023b). The multilayer perceptrons f V ε , f E ε , f V π , and f E π are composed of n ℓ = 2 layers while the multilayer perceptron f V δ is composed of n ℓ + 1 hidden layers.…”
Section: Graph Neural Network Wall Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This value implies that edge and node features that are within a distance up to N = 4 neighbors away from a given target wall node will influence the prediction. This value was found to be sufficient to discriminate non-equilibrium regions in Dupuy et al (2023b). The multilayer perceptrons f V ε , f E ε , f V π , and f E π are composed of n ℓ = 2 layers while the multilayer perceptron f V δ is composed of n ℓ + 1 hidden layers.…”
Section: Graph Neural Network Wall Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Demonstrating an ability to learn from such an heterogeneous database is crucial for the further development of machinelearning wall models with much larger datasets. The six incompressible isothermal simulations are the same as found in Dupuy et al (2023b), as summarized in Table 1: two fully developed channel flows at friction Reynolds number Re τ = 180 (CF1, (Agostini and Vincent, 2020) and Re τ = 950 (CF2, (Del Álamo and Jiménez, 2003;Lozano-Durán and Jiménez, 2014;Lozano-Durán and Jiménez, 2015); a three-dimensional diffuser corresponding to the geometry "Diffuser 1" of Cherry et al (2008) (3DD, (Ercoftac, 2022); a backward-facing step (BFS, (Pouech et al, 2019(Pouech et al, , 2021; a curved backward-facing step (APG, (Ercoftac, 2022); and a NACA 65-009 blade cascade on a flat plate such as studied experimentally by Ma et al (2011) and Zambonini et al (2017) at an incidence angle of 4°and 7°(N65) (Dupuy et al, 2023b). The five compressible anisothermal simulations are the simulations of two fully developed asymmetrically cooled/heated channel flows at friction Reynolds number Re τ = 180 (AC1, (Dupuy et al, 2018) and Re τ = 395 (AC2, (Dupuy et al, 2019), with a temperature ratio of 2 between the two walls; two fully developed symmetrically cooled channel flows at friction Reynolds number Re τ = 320 (SC1, Appendix A) and Re τ = 1150 (SC2, Appendix A), with a temperature ratio between the bulk flow and the walls of 1.1 and 3 respectively; and a cooled high-pressure turbine blade which corresponds to the test case MUR235 of Arts et al (1990) (L89, (Dupuy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations