2010
DOI: 10.1080/14786431003662580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the TDFD dissolution of Al–Fe–Mn–Si particles in an Al–4.5Zn–1Mg alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Mn concentration in the grain interior changes slightly as confirmed by the present EPMA analysis (Fig. 4) and also from modelling results, 27,28 mainly because of the low diffusion rate of Mn in the aluminium matrix. 29 As a result, the Mn concentration is too small in the grain interior to form the Mn containing dispersoids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the Mn concentration in the grain interior changes slightly as confirmed by the present EPMA analysis (Fig. 4) and also from modelling results, 27,28 mainly because of the low diffusion rate of Mn in the aluminium matrix. 29 As a result, the Mn concentration is too small in the grain interior to form the Mn containing dispersoids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As mentioned earlier, the Mn containing dispersoids only form at high temperatures (>510°C) and holding times longer than 4 h and only in the grain boundary regions. During homogenisation at high temperatures, these particles may dissolve in the microstructure, thus increasing the Mn concentration in the grain boundary regions 27,28 Figure 4. shows typical results of EPMA measurements of Mn concentration from a linescan across a grain in a sample homogenised at 550°C for 8 h. It is clear that the Mn concentration in the regions close to the Al 17 (Fe 3·2 ,Mn 0·8 )Si 2 particles increases, which is attributed to the dissolution of Al 17 (Fe 3·2 ,Mn 0·8 )Si 2 particles27,28 during homogenisation under this condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, an unusual phase composed of Al, Fe, Mn, and Si was observed. Al(Fe,Mn)Si phases have been reported in Al–Mg–Si alloys (6 xxx -series) (Lodgaard & Ryum, 2000; Buchanan et al, 2016) and Al–Zn alloys (7 xxx -series) (Eivani et al, 2010, 2011). However, to the best of our knowledge, reports on Al(Fe,Mn)Si phases in 2014Al alloys are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although homogenisation of compositional inhomogeneties (usually called 'coring') involve bulk diffusion of the alloying elements, dissolution of secondary phases involves complex interaction between diffusion, surface energy, shape and distribution of secondary phases. Hence, understanding the dissolution mechanism poses more challenging task to the researcher [21][22][23] . understanding the dissolution process of the low melting point secondary phases, such as eutectic and divorced eutectic MgZn 2 -base phases situated mainly at the inter-dendritic channels (IDC) is, therefore, of considerable interest.…”
Section: In-situ Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the dissolution of eutectic phase mixture (α-Al solid solution (dark) and Mg(Zn,Cu,Al) 2 -based η phase (bright)) follows the classical 'spheroidisation' mechanism 29 . Recently, a specific dissolution mechanism called 'Thinning, discontinuation, and full dissolution (TDfD) has been forwarded by Eivani [22][23] , et al to account for the dissolution mechanism of grain boundary phases in AlZn-Mg alloy. The dissolution mechanism of the grain boundary phases with its intermediate stages is schematically illustrated in fig.…”
Section: In-situ Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%