Modeling the Soil Shrinkage and Water Retention Curves with the Same Equations

Abstract

International audienceRecent studies underlined the likeness of soil water retention (WRC) and shrinkage curves (ShC) with respect to their shapes. This paper aims at experimentally discussing the possible use of the same equations to fit them. The WRC (on the tensiometric range) and ShC were simultaneously determined on a series made of 28 undisturbed soil cores collected in surface horizons from a wide variety of soil types, with clay content ranging from 8.5 to 65% and of 30 repacked soil samples of various clay contents and mineralogies. The van Genuchten (VG) closed-form equation of WRC and the VG modified equation of ShC, with five and three parameters, respectively, were found to fit well to both curves, but they did not properly reproduce the observed linear parts and sloping ends of both curves, and the dissymmetric shapes of the ShC as well. The exponential shrinkage model XP fitted significantly better to both the WRC with five parameters and the ShC with eight parameters. It is shown that the transition points of the XP equations independently fitted on the ShC and WRC curves occur at the same gravimetric water content, thus illustrating the likeness of the curves with respect to their shape. The WRC was estimated with a reasonable accuracy from the water content of the ShC transition points plus some measured suction values

Dual‐permeability model for flow in shrinking soil with dominant horizontal deformation

“…Nevertheless, the fitting approximations of the shrinkage curve can be still useful in engineering approaches. For numerical applications, the shrinkage curve is frequently described by using continuous functions [Braudeau et al, 1999;Groenevelt and Grant, 2001;Boivin et al, 2006aBoivin et al, , 2006b]. …”

Physics of the soil medium organization part 2: pedostructure characterization through measurement and modeling of the soil moisture characteristic curves

“…Moreover, it was also noticed that this water content was almost the same water content where the tensiometer readings reached the air entry point of the tensiometers (Figure 7A). Actually, such a behavior was reported by Boivin et al (2006), they interpreted this increase in specific volume as a result of breaking the water meniscus between sand particles due to the drying. However, this particular behavior wasn't observed in reconstituted Rodah soil samples [AM67, AM68, and AM69] which were prepared by similar procedures.…”

Simulating past droughts and associated building damages in France

“…Meteorology (temperature, precipitation, and radiation) is the principal factor driving the soil water balance, which determines in turn the amount of water in the soil. Within the soil, soil type is an important factor in determining the extent of volume changes with changing soil water content (Boivin et al, 2006). Critical soil properties are, among others, soil depth, the fraction of swelling clays and the soil's ability to take up water.…”