2017
DOI: 10.1364/oe.25.00a990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the single and multiple scattering properties of soot-laden mineral dust aerosols

Abstract: Fractal particle morphologies are employed to study the light scattering properties of soot-laden mineral dust aerosols. The applicability of these models is assessed in comparison with measurements and other numerical studies. To quantify the dust-soot mixing effects on the single and multiple scattering properties, a parameterization of the effective bulk properties is developed. Based on the parameterized bulk properties, polarized one-dimensional radiative transfer simulations are performed. The results in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an average over the aggregate size, the empirical approximation should give even better approximations. The bulk MEC and MAC are approximately 7 and 6 m 2 g −1 , respectively, at 500 nm, which is in reasonable agreement with observations (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006;Kahnert et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2017). The empirical results overestimate MEC and MAC of polydispersity by 3.7 % and 4.9 %, respectively, and underestimate those of necking by 3.6 % and 2.8 %.…”
Section: Effects Of Minor Structuressupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With an average over the aggregate size, the empirical approximation should give even better approximations. The bulk MEC and MAC are approximately 7 and 6 m 2 g −1 , respectively, at 500 nm, which is in reasonable agreement with observations (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006;Kahnert et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2017). The empirical results overestimate MEC and MAC of polydispersity by 3.7 % and 4.9 %, respectively, and underestimate those of necking by 3.6 % and 2.8 %.…”
Section: Effects Of Minor Structuressupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With an average over the aggregate size, the empirical approximation should give even better approximations. The bulk MEC and MAC are approximately 7 and 6 m 2 g -1 , respectively, at 500 nm, which is in reasonable agreement with observations (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006;Kahnert et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2017). The empirical results overestimate MEC and MAC of polydispersity by 2.8 % and 3.7 %, respectively, and underestimate those of necking by 4.5 % and 3.9 %.…”
Section: Effects Of Minor Structuressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To account for irregular geometries, multiple numerical models are available for calculating the single-scattering properties of nonspherical particles (Yang and Liou, 1996a;Mishchenko et al, 1997;Yurkin and Hoekstra, 2011;Bi et al, 2013). Following Liu et al (2013), this study uses a combination of the pseudospectral time domain (PSTD) method (Liu, 1997;Liu et al, 2012) and the improved geometric-optics method (IGOM; Yang and Liou, 1996b;Yang and Liou, 1998;Bi et al, 2014) to cover the required range of dust size parameters at visible incident wavelengths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%